Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

FW: U.S. at Odds with Rest-of-World on Fighting Global Warming

Expand Messages
  • Mike Neuman
    ... U.S. at Odds with Rest-of-World on Fighting Global Warming ... Tuesday, 14 December 2004 by Michael T. Neuman
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 14, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      ------------------------------------------------------------
      U.S. at Odds with Rest-of-World on Fighting Global Warming
      ------------------------------------------------------------
      Tuesday, 14 December 2004
      by Michael T. Neuman
      http://madison.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/20683

      Summary: Delegates numbering 6,000 from 194 countries are meeting in
      Buenos Aires, Argentina last week and this week to compare notes on
      the growing threat of global warming. The occasion is the "10th
      Conference of Parties" (COP-10) of the United Nations Framework
      Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

      Two issues dominating the conference are: (1) the ability of nations
      to adapt to a changing climate in the future, and (2) the progress of
      developed countries in reducing their nation's annual greenhouse gas
      emissions.

      Environmental ministers from 80 countries are expected to join the
      delegates on Wednesday this week and participate through to the
      closing of the conference.

      The COP-10 conference is the last annual international conference on
      climate change being held before the effective date for
      implementation of the "Kyoto Protocol" of 16 February 2005.

      The Kyoto Protocol establishes binding greenhouse gas emission limits
      (caps - millions of tons) on the 30 industrialized countries which
      have ratified the protocol, and it includes an international
      emissions trading system for countries that expect to exceed their
      limits. The protocol commits the world's developed nations to reduce
      their collective annual greenhouse gas emissions by 5 percent below
      their aggregate 1990 emissions, by the period 2008 though 2012. The
      protocol's entry into force also sets the stage for negotiations
      toward future climate commitments beyond 2012.

      The conference marks the 10th anniversary of the UNFCCC's entry into
      force. Ministers from the participating countries are engaging in
      panel discussions on accomplishments and future challenges; impacts
      of climate change, adaptation measures; sustainable development;
      technology and climate change; and mitigation of climate change,
      including policies and their impacts.

      The United Nation's International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),
      which is the research body of the U.N. on climate change, concluded
      in a landmark "2001 Assessment" that significant actions are needed
      to reduce anthropogenic (human-caused) emissions of greenhouse gases
      (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, others) to the atmosphere,
      to reduce the global warming threat to the global climate. These
      threats, which include increased flooding, more frequent and more
      intense storms, major widespread and longer lasting drought, deadly
      and longer heat waves, an expansion in the range of tropical diseases
      and continuously increasing rises in sea level (caused by melting
      glaciers and continental ice masses and by thermal expansion of ocean
      waters), are already documented to be on the rise.

      The IPCC is not alone in its conclusions. In recent years, all major
      scientific bodies in the United States whose members' expertise bears
      directly on the matter have issued similar statements. For example,
      the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report, "Climate Change
      Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions", begins: "Greenhouse
      gases are accumulating in Earth's atmosphere as a result of human
      activities, causing surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean
      temperatures to rise". The report continues: "The IPCC's conclusion
      that most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is likely to
      have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations
      accurately reflects the current thinking of the scientific community
      on this issue".

      Furthermore, the American Meteorological Society, the American
      Geophysical Union, and the American Association for the Advancement
      of Science (AAAS) all have issued statements in recent years
      concluding that the evidence for human modification of climate
      is "compelling".
      http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
      http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2004/0616climate.shtml

      It is also timely that the COP-10 conference follows on the heels of
      the Arctic Council's "Arctic Climate Impact Assessment" (ACIA), a
      report issued last month which found rapidly melting sea ice,
      retreating land glaciers, permafrost thawing and sea level increases
      in the Arctic.
      http://www.amap.no/acia/index.html
      http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/witnesslist.cfm?id=1340

      Statements from delegates of other countries reporting at the COP-10
      conference in Buenos Aires follow:

      "For the poorest of the poor countries, climate change is more
      catastrophic than terrorism", said the delegate for Tanzania, as a
      representative of 48 of the least developed countries. "Funding is
      needed to carry out assessments of where defenses must be built up to
      avoid damages, some which has already begun to occur".

      The delegate from Qatar called for more effective action to
      address "an already heavily damaged socioeconomic infrastructure"
      from global warming related extreme weather events.

      A delegation from Tuvalu, a nation of coral atolls in the western
      Pacific Ocean which are no more than five meters above sea level,
      said island states are "disappointed with countries like Australia
      and the United States that are parties to the UNFCCC but have refused
      to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, which would commit themselves to cut
      their nation's global warming emissions".

      President Bush withdrew the U.S. from the 128-nation Kyoto protocol
      in early 2001, despite the Office of the President's having signed
      the agreement in 1997. President George W. Bush stated his reasons
      for objecting to the agreement to be that the agreement would hurt
      the U.S. economy and would not require any reductions from developing
      nations. (Earlier, the U.S. Senate voted "no" by a margin of 99-0 to
      ratifying any agreement that did not apply to all the nations.)

      A report recently released by the U.S. Energy Information
      Administration finds that the U.S. has done virtually nothing to
      reduce greenhouse gases since the day the Kyoto Protocol was
      negotiated (and signed) in 1997. Total U.S. annual greenhouse gas
      emissions are now 13.4 percent higher than they were in 1990 based on
      the latest figures available (6,935.7 million metric tons of carbon
      dioxide equivalent (MMTCDE) in 2003 vs. 6,115.2 MMTCDE in 1990).
      Since greenhouse gases are cumulative in the atmosphere over time
      (carbon dioxide has a life of 50 - 200 years in the atmosphere), and
      each year's emissions are compounded with earlier emissions and
      succeeding emissions; this importance of beginning to reduce
      emissions as soon as possible and to the fullest extent possible
      cannot be overemphasized.

      There is near unanimous agreement among scientists that timely
      actions to slow the continuing buildup of greenhouse gases in the
      atmosphere (from fuel burning in automobiles, power plant emissions,
      industrial emissions, other transportation emissions) is imperative
      if significant reductions to the threats of global warming are to be
      realized. The impacts of global warming on the human environment are
      expected to be profoundly negative and could be upon us sooner than
      at first predicted, due to positive feedbacks in the climate system
      that amplify smaller warming effects into more pronouced ones.

      Delegates to this year's UN Conference have been spending much of
      their time trying to convince the U.S. government to agree to tighter
      environmental targets for the U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, since
      the U.S. is the leading emitter of greenhouse gases to the
      atmosphere. However, President George W. Bush is staying firm on his
      opposition to mandatory emissions controls over greenhouse gas
      emissions for the U.S., in favor of a voluntary approach for up to 10
      years while the results of more research on global warming come in.

      In an update last Saturday, experts warned that Latin America was
      especially hard hit by the so-called "greenhouse effect," with
      emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases blamed for abrupt climate
      changes in a region that is home to more than 300 million people.

      Although Latin America accounts for only about 4.3 percent of all
      global greenhouse gas output, a preliminary report prepared by
      environment officials from several countries highlighted signs of
      recent altered weather patterns, including increased flooding and
      droughts in Central and South America.

      "The region is very vulnerable to extreme weather events," said
      Fernando Tudela Abad, an official in the Mexican government's
      environmental ministry.

      The report, titled "Climate Change in Latin America: Challenges and
      Opportunities" cited energy production and transportation emissions
      as accounting for most of the region's output of greenhouse gases,
      which rank behind the United States, Europe and Asia, but ahead of
      Africa's annual output.

      The top European Union negotiator urged participating nations to move
      quickly toward formal talks on new targets for cutting greenhouse
      gases emissions after 2012. But the Bush administration's position is
      that it is too early to talk about cutting greenhouse gas emissions
      after 2012.

      Some at the conference have expressed hope that the United States and
      large developing nations such as China and India might be more
      willing to curb emissions or take other steps to slow global warming
      beyond 2012.

      References:
      http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=26561
      http://www.amap.no/acia/index.html
      http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/news/shownews.jsp?content=w121139A
      http://madison.indymedia.org/feature/display/20033/index.php

      http://www.livescience.com/forcesofnature/041209_runaway_glacier.html
      ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/pub/oiaf/1605/cdrom/pdf/ggrpt/057303.pdf
      Madison IMC: http://madison.indymedia.org/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.