41018Re: [CentralTexasGeocachers] AJW's Initial Cache archived!?
- Dec 13, 2012I had the same thought about the property owner's motivation. Of course, given the proximity of the property to public park space, it's surprising that the property owner didn't have "Private Property" signs all over the place anyway.The only beef I had with the property owner and Prime is that they did not just contact the CO and ask him to remove the cache…DaveTeam LandsharkFrom: Jay Bingham <binghamjc@...>
Date: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: [CentralTexasGeocachers] AJW's Initial Cache archived!?
So sad to see that one go. Yes, Barb/Tygress, there are lots of places for caches most of them mundane, there are far fewer exceptional places for caches and that one was an exceptional place. I wondered when I found it if it was not on private property. Given the terrain rating I can see why a property owner would not want to have the liability if something happened there.
--| Jay /\ Bing-GTX
|+| Georgetown , TX USA
|-- “What you see depends mainly on what you are looking for.”
From: CentralTexasGeocachers@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CentralTexasGeocachers@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Matt Wilson
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 5:38 AM
Cc: Fred Wilson; Keith Wilson
Subject: [CentralTexasGeocachers] AJW's Initial Cache archived!?
Holy cow!! Was AJW (GC2YVT7) really on private property? I somehow doubt it. Sounds like last finders just "poked" around too far.
Nonetheless, while I certainly agree that caches shouldn't exist near places that cause any major amount of alarm or discomfort that would bring Geocaching a bad name, this sudden and brutal Prime Reviewer archive log makes me pretty sad.
Also, I vaguely remember not being able to log an archived cache, but I also know for a fact that I've logged at least a couple that were archived, but still there. Thoughts?
Matt / Kemis
Sent from a mobile device
On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:50 PM, "Keith Wilson" <keith.wilson@...> wrote:
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>