18904Re: Recall of Message #18729
- Sep 6, 2008--- In CarFree@yahoogroups.com, "intjring" <intjring@...> wrote:
> I'm not going to study years of archives because someone refuses towhat
> write a lucid post. You still haven't answered my question about
> you meant by saying you "clung" to Obama,TF: I "clung to" Carter too! There's nothing "non-lucid" about that,
except to the most narrow-minded people. But since this list is full
of them, here's the clarification of what "clung to" means:
"Clung to" Carter means that I voted for Carter, both times. In the
case of Obama, "clung to" means that yes, I'm an ex-supporter of him
and I planned for over a year to vote for him, until just the other
day when the reminding-me-of-Bob-Matter factor that I explained in my
earlier post came along.
> but don't bother. ItTF: It obviously mattered plenty to you, because if it didn't you
> doesn't matter that much.
wouldn't have asked. Therefore, I ignored your rude request to not
> Geez, I can't even ask a question about something that obviouslymade
> no senseTF: My point exactly: Only to the most narrow-minded people does
it "obviously make no sense"; see above.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>