Re: Service Ride Control RENAME: Quality
- Hi Preston,
I weighed my 94 with 8 gals. on board and less than 120 lbs in the
trunk, it weighed in at 3950, that's approx. 500 lbs. less than my
83. Considering that your Brougham is on a completely different
chassis(I believe that it shares much with the Impala)and it's RWD, I
would have hoped for more than you state. I read that some
suspension components are interchangable with the Impala SS of the
same vintage(94-96), perhaps you might look that way to improve on
your handling. I have always liked your model of Fleetwood, because
I am and always will be a RWD fan, no matter what is to be said about
FWD! I just like the way RWD sets up and power-to-weight
distribution works. It's just more dependable when the chips are
down. If FWD were all THAT great, then why aren't there any FWD
NASCARS or open wheel cars? I mean, just imagine how good the Viper
would work with FWD instead of RWD(yuk)? Now THAT would be
--- In Cadillac_Performance_Association@yahoogroups.com, Preston III
> Wow, I thought I was the only one that believed that.
> I too, have an '84 Coupe Deville, and a '94 Fleetwood Brougham.
> '94 just doesn't handle nearly as well as the '84. The '94 seemsto
> wallow and float, whereas the '84 seems much more stable andsolid.
> Truthfully, I don't think the '94 will last nearly as well as
>SDV IS, in
> Preston III
> Bill <cbxsage@...> wrote:
> The sad part of this scenario is the fact that the aforementioned
> fact, better handling than my 94 which is lighter and more powerful.
> Thanks Again,
> What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos