Re: [CDV700CLUB] Re: Nu Energy Battery to be Revealed at Inventor's Weekend
- <nu_energy_scientist> writes:
> http://www.nuenergy.org/pdf/alloy.pdfThis is, by far, the most cryptic and convoluted way I have ever heard of
> "How will I market my lead-210 activated electret batteries? I am
> certain that this source of cheap power will never be allowed in the
> public domain.
> For one thing, the power moguls behind the billion-
> dollar battery industry will oppose them violently. The answer to
> this is to refrain from selling them to the public.
> My idea is to
> have people become members of my ISIS Community. Members will be
> to make cash donations to the their community and will receive a
> exchange of lead-210 batteries."
for a person to obtain batteries.
Let's see if I understand your marketing scheme: Members pay fees (what
you call "making donations") to join your club, and in return you are
donating the batteries to your members?
Will this "ISIS community" be run as a for-profit business or as a
Sorry to be so blunt, but the scheme sent up a red flag.
- I would like to discuss the presence of radiation in chocolate again.
Anyone who wants their chocolate tested, send a pound to me. Sorry,
Chocolate can not be returned.
PS I just finished 2200 mile rad survey from eastern MO to western
CO, and can say that there is a lot more background radiation out
west than we have in the Midwest (5X on average) Also we stopped at
the U of K to view the Sternberg fossil collection, and the Fisk
collection too. Both have mineral displays with the Fisk collection
being very extensive. Our destination was the National Mining Museum,
in Leadville CO, where they have a very good mineral collection with
lots of U ores and Barite.
The main reason for this trip was to pick up a Canberra 727 lead
shield for my 3" NaI well scint( 280 pounds worth of graded
shielding!), which is now back here at the home lab.
In CDV700CLUB@yahoogroups.com, Phil Bigelow <bigelowp@j...> wrote:
> I believe that listmember Reber is correct and I will refrain from
> furthering discussion on Bruce's device. I encourage other list
> to do the same. Bruce is, of course, welcome to stay on the listand
> participate in topical conversations (e.g., radiation detectors andtechnology
> experiments associated with radiation detectors). But battery
> and posting advertisments for infomercial videotapes is clearly off-topic
> for our forum.have
> This thread may be one of those infrequent instances where Tom may
> to impliment his Hammer O' Death and forceably kill the the thread.my
> I wish Bruce good luck, but for me, I've now read enough to satisfy
> suspicions and I am ending my participation in this thread.