Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [ByzantiumNovumCulture] Last four posts

Expand Messages
  • Timothy Dawson
    ... Byzantine attire in the files section. Yes, good try. It is just a shame that they are mostly wrong. Just a few examples: 1: the khlamus was never any
    Message 1 of 2 , Jan 4, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      > I have just posted patterns for four different articles of
      Byzantine attire in the files section.

      Yes, good try. It is just a shame that they are mostly wrong. Just a
      few examples:

      1: the khlamus was never any other shape than oval, except from the
      later C11th when they cut it down to semi-oval, and often modified the
      decorative scheme.
      2: It was never worn in any other way than on the right shoulder. The
      type of mantle worn fastened on the chest had several different names
      and different characteristics (except from the later C11th ...).
      3: The khlamus was already only formal wear by the fifth century. Day
      to day wear for a man was a *coat*.
      4: The rectangular women's shawl was not a φαινώλης (singular.
      fainôlai is plural). It was called various other things. The
      fainôlês was semi-circle closed to a cone.
      5: Pretty well all the details of the delmatikion are wrong,
      especially in connection with men.

      More detail on Late Antiquity will be available in my book, By the
      Emperor's Hand: court regalia and military dress in the Eastern Roman
      Empire, c. 500–1453, due out later this year. (Don't be fooled by
      the title - it does cover womnen's clothing as well) In the meantime,
      for the middle Byzantine period, there are my Guides. Got to http://www.levantia.com.au
      and proceed to "Products".

      Timothy



      Dr. Timothy Dawson
      Secretary / Treasurer
      Hetaireia Palatiou
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.