Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Border fence project facing delays

Expand Messages
  • Steven L. Robinson
    GAO: Border fence schedule snagged Feds report 08 construction plans proving difficult By Kevin Sieff The Brownsville Herald February 29, 2008 For the first
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 29, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      GAO: Border fence schedule snagged
      Feds report '08 construction plans proving 'difficult'

      By Kevin Sieff
      The Brownsville Herald
      February 29, 2008

      For the first time since the Secure Fence Act was passed in October 2006,
      the federal government has acknowledged that it might not meet its objective
      of building 370 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border before
      December 2008.

      On Wednesday, the Government Accountability Office released a statement
      outlining the challenges the fence's planners now face. "Customs and Border
      Patrol officials reported that meeting deadlines has been difficult because
      of various factors including difficulties in acquiring rights to border
      lands." Although the report asserts that construction is currently
      proceeding as planned, it acknowledges that "keeping on schedule will be
      challenging."

      The GAO also announced that the construction of a virtual fence in Arizona
      will be delayed until 2011, three years after its initial deadline.

      In its reference to the status of the physical barrier, the report alludes
      to the nearly 25 lawsuits that the federal government has filed against
      Cameron County and Hidalgo County landowners in the last two months.

      Cameron County resident and UTB-TSC professor Eloisa Tamez was sued on Feb.
      8, but District Judge Andrew Hanen has yet to issue a decision on the case.
      Tamez's lawyer, Peter Schey, argued that in suing his client under the
      Declaration of Taking Act, the United States ignored a congressional statute
      outlining steps that must be followed in the land condemnation process.

      Lawsuits against additional landowners and institutions - including the
      Texas Southmost College District - were filed several weeks ago, but no
      hearing has been set. According to lawyers at Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid,
      which represents defendants in two of the pending cases, the federal
      judiciary is likely waiting for Hanen to issue his ruling on Tamez's case
      before subsequent suits are heard.

      "To me, it's a triumph," Tamez said. "We're finally gaining ground here. The
      awareness that we wanted to create is having an impact in the right places."

      But despite the admission of legal obstacles facing the construction of a
      physical fence, the GAO report cites the inevitability of a delay only in
      the case of the virtual fence.

      "This shows that there is flexibility - they're just not implementing it
      with the construction of a physical barrier," said Tino Gallegos, a staff
      attorney at TRLA. "But the admission of possible delays does point to
      recognition that they don't have to adhere to strict deadlines or the
      original proposal in the case of the fence."

      When it was first announced, the Department of Homeland Security's deadline
      created a sense of urgency for local officials. According to DHS' initial
      plans, 17 miles of fencing would be built along the border in Brownsville by
      the end of this year.

      As of Feb. 21, 168 miles of pedestrian fence had been built along the
      U.S.-Mexico border, but no construction has been completed in Cameron
      County.

      The possible delay comes less than a week before Texas' presidential
      primary, in which the border fence has become a central issue. Both
      Democratic candidates, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, have spoken openly
      of the need to revise DHS' current plans and work in closer cooperation with
      landowners. Representatives from both camps released statements about the
      GAO report Thursday.

      "While the Department of Homeland Security's track record of failure is
      hardly a surprise, it doesn't mean we should give up on knowing and
      controlling who crosses our borders," said Josh Earnest, Texas
      communications director for Obama.

      In a prepared statement, Clinton said, "The Bush Administration's delay in
      constructing a 'virtual fence' along the border underscores the poor
      planning behind this government's immigration reform efforts."

      Even a short delay would give the next president, along with Congress,
      significant oversight on the fence's implementation.

      "This is good news," said Cameron County Judge Carlos Cascos. "It gives
      everyone time to re-evaluate the need for a physical barrier."

      On Tuesday, Cascos and other county officials met with DHS officials to
      discuss the possibility of a levee-fence hybrid. After federal officials
      made it clear that the county would not be reimbursed for the $50 million
      project, Cascos called the proposal "just too risky to risk taxpayer
      dollars."

      Sen. John Cornyn, who recently traveled with Cascos along the border, has
      been a vocal advocate of alternatives to the border fence-including the
      levee-fence hybrid. Cornyn voiced his disappointment over the virtual
      fence's current stalemate, which, for the senator, means one less
      alternative to a physical barrier.

      "In the end," Cornyn told The Herald on Thursday, "physical barriers are not
      the end-all be-all of border security."

      http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/fence_84820___article.html/border_coun
      ty.html

      This email was cleaned by emailStripper, available for free from
      http://www.papercut.biz/emailStripper.htm
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.