Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.


Expand Messages
  • shearly mel
    Refer to the article on female foeticide / female infanticide facilitated by prenatal diagnosis. www.hinduonnet.com page 16 Sunday, the 1st of July 2002
    Message 1 of 2 , Jun 30, 2002
      Refer to the article on female foeticide / female
      infanticide facilitated by prenatal diagnosis.
      www.hinduonnet.com page 16 Sunday, the 1st of July


      ST.JOSEPH`S COLLEGE (Autonomous)

      Do You Yahoo!?
      Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
    • Rosemary Amey
      The article was a bit hard to find so I am reproducing it here. Peace, Rosemary http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/06/30/stories/2002063000511600.htm Dead
      Message 2 of 2 , Jul 1, 2002
        The article was a bit hard to find so I am reproducing it here.

        Dead before they are even born

        Advances in medical technology have led to a spurt in female foeticide.

        INDIA WAS rudely woken from deep slumber when the 2001 Census revealed a
        sharp decline in the sex ratio of children in the 0-6 years age group with
        the number of females per 1,000 males declining from 945 in 1991 to 927.
        After the previous decade had witnessed an overall improvement in the skewed
        ratio of females to males, the sudden drop was proof of the increased
        incidence of sex-selective abortions or female foeticide.

        To their horror, women's groups discovered a dramatic drop in the female
        population in this age group in Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat
        and Maharashtra. All these States had advanced ultrasound and genetic
        facilities indicating that medical technology was being misused there. The
        statistics were a stark reminder that if things were not set right
        immediately and girls given their due place in society, the country would
        definitely face a crisis. Over the years, the sex ratio has shown a
        disconcerting decline and the malaise of discriminating against the girl
        child, which had its roots in North India, has spread towards the more
        educated and liberal South as well.

        Also, due to advanced techniques female foeticide had upstaged female
        infanticide and in place of amniocentesis, which involved taking of foetal
        samples, ultrasound scanning had emerged as a simpler and more popular
        method of sex-determination.

        As per Census figures, between 1901 and 1991 only Himachal Pradesh, Punjab,
        Kerala and Rajasthan had registered an increase in the number of females per
        1,000 males with Orissa, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh showing the
        maximum decline. It is common knowledge that in many societies a girl child
        is looked down upon because of the socio-economic factors.

        The fact that this discrimination is more prevalent in the intermediate
        classes and castes with substantial resources in land and money than in the
        poor and lower caste families indicates that the trend is influenced by the
        practise of dowry and inheritance laws relating to property.

        In 1991, Haryana had the lowest sex ratio of 875/1,000 with Punjab close
        behind at 882. A study by the State Resource Centre of Literacy Mission,
        Haryana, showed that the transfer of reproductive technology to India had
        had an adverse effect and resulted in the abuse of pre-natal diagnostic
        techniques. These measures had reinforced patriarchal values by
        discriminating against the girl child. So, a need was felt for fighting the
        dominant culture of patriarchy. To the relief of those fighting to curb
        female foeticide, the 2001 Census report came just in time, and in response
        to public interest litigations the Supreme Court stepped in and ordered a
        check on the uncontrolled proliferation of ultrasound scan centres.

        And in the period since, a number of steps have been initiated to check
        female foeticide. In this regard the Court ordered the implementation of the
        Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act,
        which had come into being in 1994. The Act, whose rules were framed in 1996
        and came into force on January 1, 1996, regulates pre-natal diagnostic
        techniques and covers the use of ultrasound machines. Since the PNDT Act was
        not implemented by the Centre or the States, a petition was filed in the
        Supreme Court by the Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes
        (CEHAT), a research centre of the Anusandhan Trust based in Pune and Mumbai,
        along with Mahila Sarvangeen Utkarsh Mandal (Masum), a Maharashtra-based
        organisation, and Sabu M. Georges, an expert in the field.

        While the Court issued notices to the parties concerned on May 9, 2000, it
        took almost a year for the various States to file their affidavits. The
        Court found that "despite the PNDT Act being enacted by Parliament five
        years back, neither the State Governments nor the Central Government has
        taken appropriate actions for its implementations".

        The Centre was then directed to create an awareness against the practice of
        pre-natal sex determination and female foeticide through appropriate
        releases/programmes in the electronic media. This was to be done by the
        Central Supervisory Board (CSB) as provided in Section 16 (iii) of the PNDT

        The CSB was told to have its meeting at least once in six months and its
        constitution was provided under Section 7, which empowered the Central
        Government to appoint to the Board 10 members primarily comprising eminent
        medical practitioners, social scientists and representatives of women's
        welfare organisations.

        The CSB was also ordered to direct to all States and Union Territories to
        furnish quarterly returns on the implementation and working of the Act.
        These returns were to specify the survey and registration of bodies and
        action taken against non-registered bodies operating in violation of Section
        3 of the Act. They were to provide details of the complaints received and
        action taken along with the number and nature of the awareness campaigns
        conducted and their results.

        Further, the States and Union Territories were asked to appoint by
        notification fully empowered Appropriate Authorities at district and
        sub-district levels and also Advisory Committees to aid and advise the
        Appropriate Authority in the discharge of its functions. These Appropriate
        Authorities were in turn told to take action against any person or body
        issuing any advertisement in violation of Section 22 of the Act, which
        barred advertisements of pre-natal sex-determination tests, and against
        persons operating ultrasound centres without a valid certificate of
        registration under the Act.

        But since the Appropriate Authorities are to furnish compliance reports,
        many doctors believe this would prompt them to set targets and fulfil them
        in whatever way possible.

        Sanjay Parikh, counsel for CEHAT, says the research centre wants all users
        of ultrasound machines to register themselves to facilitate proper
        monitoring of their functioning. Those doctors or centres facing harassment
        could approach the Court and seek redress. Calling for registration in a
        time-bound manner, Mr. Parikh hopes the Act will ultimately curb the
        practice of female foeticide.

        The former Union Health and Family Welfare secretary, A.R. Nanda, says the
        Appropriate Authorities have been vested with powers only within the ambit
        of the law. "While they were negligent with the use earlier, following
        directions from the Supreme Court they have started registering all
        ultrasound facilities."

        Mr. Nanda says the idea behind the registration drive is to prevent
        <147,1,0>the misuse of ultrasound facilities. Admitting that there were
        bound to be "teething troubles" in the implementation, he said efforts were
        on to sensitise all officials concerned.

        "At the end of June, zonal meetings have been convened of Appropriate
        Authorities and District authorities in Chandigarh, Bangalore and Lucknow to
        apprise them of the provisions of the law. The exercise is being undertaken
        to make the officials understand legal niceties, clear doubts pertaining to
        implementation of PNDT Act and to sort out the problems."

        At one place, officials were even told to register portable ultrasound

        However, Mr. Nanda acknowledges that there are bound to be problems with the
        implementation due to a lack of understanding.

        "But then aggrieved parties can always seek redress from the State
        Government, the Advisory Committees or even the CSB." As for the amendment
        to the PNDT Act, he insists that it would iron out the rough spots. "It
        would not equate the ultrasound centres with the genetic clinics and
        laboratories but treat them as a special category.''

        Holding the view that some in the medical fraternity were trying to mount
        pressure on the amendment which not only seeks to control "pre-natal" but
        also "pre-conception" techniques, he says the country should gear up to face
        the new challenge of "pre-conception sex manipulation".

        "There are American firms knocking at our doors for setting up facilities
        for pre-conception techniques. What we need to study is whether this is
        acceptable. For, when a coercive population policy is introduced heralding a
        one-child or two-child norm, these techniques would further aggravate the
        sex-ratio," says Mr. Nanda.

        Bureaucrats and doctors feel sending decoy-customers is the most effective
        way of curbing sex-determination tests.

        As of now, improper implementation of the Act and the activities of
        unscrupulous doctors in collusion with corrupt officials have jacked up the
        rate of illegal sex-determination tests from Rs. 1,500 to Rs. 4,000 in
        places such as Gurgaon.
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.