Re: [TruthorTradition] Re: looking for truth- stil here
- Thank you for asking this Tim. I would also be very interested in what makes a true believer. When somebody challenges us to answering questions it reeks of that somebody asking only to abuse our answers. The fair thing to do would be to break "true believer" down as well as give an interpretation of the said parables and asking if we agreed/disagreed/had anything to add.Ahava ShalomSea
Hurt people hurt people Bill Cosby.----- Original Message -----From: "Tim H" <THardesty@...>Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 12:52 AMSubject: [TruthorTradition] Re: looking for truth- stil here> Hello Believer X, I'm still trying to figure out
> what makesyou a true believer and no one else.
> Can you break it down and simplifyit for me in
> about 25 words or less? What are the keyfactors?
> In Christ,
> Tim H
>> maybe you thought i was rapturedchallenge
>> No I have read evry malicious comment and unfounded assertion just
>> havent responded yet because no one here seemed to take my
>> seriously the name of your group is what? seems tome you tilt
> moreyou claim
>> to the side of tradition- If the Christ
>> is the same yesterday today and forever what is soimplausible and
>> even more importantly unscriptural about Christappearing to
> someone15:8 and remember the scripture
>> subsequent to His ascension? 1cor
>> cannot be broken. I cou;d be bornjust as untimely as well
>> Did anyone here ever learn in logic class- you cant prove a
>> have a nice
>> --- Inhref="mailto:TruthorTradition@yahoogroups.com">TruthorTradition@yahoogroups.com, "Phillip Wilson"
>> <pclarkw@> wrote:find any
>> > BelieverX seems to have disappeared. I guess he could not
>> > true believers here either, it must be terrible toroam the world
>> > totally alone.TruthorTradition@yahoogroups.com, "Sea" <seawife@> wrote:
>> > Phillip
>> > --- In
>> > >was thinking along the same lines Philip but thought it
>> > > LOL I
>> > not toI laughed out loud when I read this
>> > > say so. Nevertheless,
>> > it was as
>> > > if you were reading my mind.
>> > >
>> > > Ahava Shalom
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >"true believers" here.
>> > >
>> > > >Phillip:
>> > > >I don't think your going to find any
>> of us
>> > > > are just saved by grace through faith.
>> > > >
>> > > > Have you sought any professional help for your
>> > > >Phillip
>> > > >
>> > > >may
>> > > >
>> > > > Believer X wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I just joined this group. The reason was the possibility I
>> > > > actually find just 1 true believer. In the 22years since
> Christbeen unable to encounter a single
>> > > > appeared to me I have
> faithfulbeliever that even has the capacity to understand the true
>> > > >
>> > > > the scriptures. I haven't found a single genuineteacher for
>> thatEverything of any value hes been taught to me
>> > > > matter either.
>> > > > himself. Here is a challenge if any of you areup to it.
> Pleaseparable of the leaven I've searched
>> > > > explain Matt. 13:33 the
> theyou a question to ponder: If
>> > > > and I could not find 1 accurate interpretation of any of
>> > > > parables. And I will also give
>> Jesuswanted His mysteries revealed for everyone to read,(which
>> > > >
>> > > > He doesn't) WHY isn't what He said toHis disciples in acts 1
>> (wheremany things concerning the Kingdom of God)
>> > > > He taught
>> > > > like the perfect opportunity to trumpet thetruth. I am
> joininggroups as I can trying
>> > > > many
>> > > >> to find someone,anyone. please do me a favor and reply to
>> thisonline. thanx
>> > > > address as well as on the board because I don't think I'll be
>> able to
>> > > > sort thru all the message posts
>> > > >>Believer X
>> > > >>
> Yahoo! Groups
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go
> <*> Your emailsettings:
> Individual Email | Traditionalhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/TruthorTradition/join
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> (Yahoo! ID required)
><*> To change settings via email:
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, sendan email to:
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subjectto:
- Hi Sea, my comments below.
> Sea wrote:husband for adultery and marries another is an adulteress. See Tim
> More than that Judy. Tim claims that a woman who divorces her
teaches that the adultery law is only against women.
Again you are misrepresenting what I have posted,
and I would appreciate it if you would stop.
Certainly a man can commit adultery. If a man
marries a divorced woman whose ex-husband is
still alive, then he (and she) have committed
> Sea:with a single woman while married to somebody else.
> It is not possible for a man to commit adultery
If he is having sexual relations with a single woman
out of wedlock then he is not committing adultery.
He is committing the sin of fornication. If he
marries her as his second wife, then he is not
committing adultery, and neither is she, provided
she has not been married before.
> Sea:and walking with the Lord while a woman who divorces
> So angel, who took another woman's husband is pure
her husband for adultery becomes an adulteress the moment
she marries another. A cheated on wife just has to deal
with it. She has no rights. And that is why angel is
allowed to call me a serpent possessing the wiles of
Satan while Kevin is banned for calling angel an
adulteress according to the words of Jesus. So when
push comes to shove it is all about who agrees with whom.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Judy Hake" <judy@...>
> To: <TruthorTradition@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 6:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [TruthorTradition] looking for truth- stil here
> > Tim,
> > Am I understanding correctly that you're saying that a man who
> > and remarries is not committing adultery because God never saidbigamy
> > was a sin? I hope not, because that just strikes me as verylegalistic
> > thinking, and you don't seem legalistic to me.
> > Judy
> > At 12:18 PM 8/18/2008, you wrote:
> >>TIM H:
> >>The simple fact that your husband married another woman
> >>is not adultery. The simple fact that Bimbo married
> >>your ex-husband is not adultery, either (assuming she
> >>was never married before).