OR - North 49 Ultra Lite Dry Sac - Andrea Murland
Here's one for this month's call.
Red pens out!!
OR North 49 Ultra Lite Dry Sac
Owner Review by Andrea Murland
August 16, 2012
Manufacturer: North 49
Manufacturer's URL: None
Model: Ultra Lite Dry Sack
Year of Manufacture: 2009
MSRP: Not Available
Size Reviewed: 13 L (793 cu in)
Other Sizes Available: 8 L (488 cu in), 20 L (1220 cu in), 35 L (2136 cu in)
Listed Weight: None
Measured Weight: 63 g (2.2 oz)
Measured Dimensions: 20.3 cm (8.0 in) diameter x 50.5 cm (19.9 in) tall
The North 49 Ultra Lite Dry Sac is made of a lightweight nylon fabric. The seams are taped for waterproofing. The bag has a round bottom, so when packed the bag forms a cylinder. The top of the bag has a stiffened strip, 2 cm (0.8 in) wide, and a sewn in label with the North 49 logo and the size of the bag. Each end of the top strip has half of a buckle closure, and one side has a D-ring. The bag closes by rolling the top strip over and clipping the buckle together. The outside of the bag has screen-printed text which says "Ultra lite Dry Sac 13 L" and has the North 49 logo. Most of the screen printing on my bag has worn off.
I purchased my Dry Sac in 2009 and immediately put it into use as an integral part of my search and rescue pack. I keep all of my essential gear in it that never changes when I grab my pack and go: spare clothes, fire starting materials, first aid kit, and some other odds and ends. In the 3 years that I've owned this bag, it has spent about 85% of its time packed, rolled, and in my pack. When I go backpacking, the Dry Sac becomes my food bag, and has been put in food caches and hung from cables, poles, and branches about 15 times.
The primary use of my Ultra Lite Dry Sac has been to keep my essential search and rescue gear dry, and although the bag has gotten wet from rain or snow soaking through my pack several times, the contents have never gotten wet. On one memorable occasion when I was travelling, I had laundry and some other odds and ends packed in the bag while flying home from a rock climbing trip, and the Dry Sac successfully contained a hairspray disaster (aerosol can + pressure change = leak) and prevented a spread of the mess to everything else in my luggage.
As a food bag the Dry Sac is great. The size I have is sufficient for most trips I take, depending on how many people's food I'm trying to stuff in it and how compact the food is, but in general I can squash everything I need in it. Once closed the bag is easy to hang either directly through the loop created by the roll top, or through the D-ring attached to the buckle.
I find the Dry Sac quick and easy to use. I put all the contents in, squash them down, and then start to roll the top of the bag down before letting air back in. Occasionally it takes me two tries to get all the air out, but with 3 years of practice I've gotten quite proficient.
The durability of my Dry Sac has been great. I thought when it got hairsprayed that it would deteriorate, but there is no visible damage to anything and it hasn't leaked yet. The buckle closes securely, and there is just the odd loose thread showing. The screen printing on the outside is mostly worn off, but that doesn't affect the function.
The North 49 Ultra Lite Dry Sac is a lightweight, simple dry sack that has proved very useful in keeping my gear dry and my food hanging up at night. I hope it remains a part of my gear for a long time to come.
Getting the air out takes some practice
Screen printing worn off (I'm stretching for that one...)
- PLEASE READ THIS EMAIL IN FULL. IT IS MOST IMPORTANT!
Thanks for your Owner's Review. It has been added to the Owner Review Queue and will be picked up by an Edit Moderator soon. If you are new to BackpackGearTest.org, welcome to the community! The Editors will work with you, within their own time constraints, to get your first two Owner Reviews approved and upload in a timely manner. Do not worry if nothing happens with it for several days. All our Editors are volunteers and your report will be subject to an official edit within fourteen days. If you have not had a response from an Edit Moderator via the Yahoo Groups list within this timeframe, please let me know directly at jdeben(at)hotmail.com
To assist in this process, if this is your first Owner Review we ask that you post only ONE Owner Review for edit at a time. Our experience is that it is more efficient for both the Editors and
yourself, if you post your first review, have it edited, approved and uploaded before you post your second and subsequent reviews.
Once your first two Owner Reviews have been approved and you have submitted your Tester Agreement you will be eligible to start applying for Tests. If you'd like more assistance or guidance with the process you can request a mentor by sending an email to Jenn K., the mentor coordinator, at mentor (at) backpackgeartest.org.
You may receive edits or comments from other members of the group. These edits and comments, while not official, should be considered carefully, and if you find them substantial, revise and re-post your review. Incorporating member edits and re-submitting to the list
will usually result in a better review, as well as making things easier for the official Editor. Please put REVISED in the subject line of your re-submitted review if you take this route or make any
changes to your review BEFORE the review has been taken by an Edit Moderator.
Additionally, it is important for you to monitor the Yahoo Groups list to keep track of the progress of your Owner Review. Once an Editor has taken your OR and made the necessary edits they will post their comments to the list with EDIT in the subject line. Once you have incorporated these edits into your review please use REPOST in the subject line. When your OR has been approved by the Editor they will use APPROVED in the subject line.
If you'd like to keep track of the progress of your OR while it's in the edit queue, the entire Owner Review Queue is posted to this yahoo group list on either Thursdays or Fridays.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to ask via the list or contact me directly.
Editors Team Director