Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

EDIT: Repost: OWNER REVIEW - Life-Link Guide Ultra Light Pole

Expand Messages
  • edwardripleyduggan
    Thanks! Much improved, but I still need the field conditions section I mentioned. To pull an example from a recent pole review, this should read along the
    Message 1 of 5 , Dec 1, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Thanks! Much improved, but I still need the field conditions section I
      mentioned. To pull an example from a recent pole review, this should
      read along the following lines (just as a specimen--you don't have to
      follow this precisely, but temperatures, elevations etc. need to be

      "I have used the Expeditions on every snow related trip from early
      2004 until winter of 2006. This includes trips to Mount Shasta, White
      Mountain, Mount San Gorgonio and San Jacinto (and neighboring peaks)
      and many places in the eastern Sierra Nevada. Conditions have ranged
      from beautiful sunny winter days to a few full-on blizzards and
      everything in between. The temperatures encountered have run from a
      low of 4 F to 50 F (-16 to 10 C) and elevations to over 14000' (4270
      m). The terrain included snow, ice, rock and occasional bare dirt,
      though not often."--Ray Estrella

      You are close in your first paragraph of the field review, but it
      lacks specificity.



      --- In BackpackGearTest@yahoogroups.com, "chunghe2" <chunghe2@...> wrote:
      > Ted,
      > Thanks for the comments. I have incorporated your edits and reposted
      > the review here. The html version has been uploaded onto the BGT
      > website. Let me know if you have any additional suggestions.
      > November 27, 2007
      > NAME: Heesoo Chung
      > EMAIL: chunghe2 (at) yahoo (dot) com
      > AGE: 29
      > LOCATION: Lenoir City, TN
      > GENDER: M
      > HEIGHT: 5' 11" (1.80 m)
      > WEIGHT: 170 lb (77.10 kg)
      > I started backpacking 14 years ago with the Boy Scouts. My backpack
      > is currently on the lighter side (12 lbs / 5.4 kg base weight) with
      > the occasional luxury item thrown in (ex. a whole chocolate cake). I
      > have done week long trips in Colorado and Montana using traditional
      > methods (20 lbs / 9.1 kg base weight). I have also done trips with a
      > SUL pack (5 lbs / 2.3 kg base weight). I recently moved from Colorado
      > to Tennessee but I am still hoping to do some cold weather
      > backpacking this winter.
      > Manufacturer: Life-Link
      > Year of Manufacture: 2004
      > Manufacturer's Website: www.life-link.com
      > MSRP: US$99.95
      > Listed Weight: 14 oz (397 g) per pair
      > Measured Weight: 16.5 oz (468 g) per pair
      > Measured Extended Length: 48" (122 cm)
      > Measured Packed Length: 30" (76 cm)
      > The Life-Link Guide Ultra Light is a two piece adjustable hiking pole
      > that has an aluminum upper section and a lower section made of carbon
      > fiber. The grip is made of foam and comes with a removable wrist
      > strap.
      > FIELD USE
      > These poles have been with me for the last three years. I have used
      > them in mud, rain, snow, sand and scree. I have abused these poles
      > on the rock and root filled Appalachian Trail, on snowshoe trips
      > above the treeline in Colorado, and in the Sierras.
      > The Guide Ultra Light is easily adjustable and has an agreeable swing
      > weight. The grip and strap are comfortable and does not get saturated
      > with sweat or get stinky. However, my preference would be a thinner
      > strap.
      > The carbon fiber lowers are much more durable than expected. The
      > poles feel quite solid and dampen vibrations well. The poles are not
      > excessively noisy. They do not produce any odd clacks, boings, or
      > wumps.
      > Around the first thousand miles of use, one of the tips got caught in
      > a rock and broke. According to the manufacturers website, the carbide
      > flex tip is designed to break before the more expensive carbon fiber
      > section. The replacement tips cost $10 for a pair and were easy to
      > replace.
      > Around two thousand miles of use, I was scrambling down some slick
      > boulders when I got the bottom 18 inches caught in a crevice. The
      > carbon fiber lower broke cleanly at the point of failure. The
      > aluminum upper section bent in such a way that the carbon fiber
      > section no longer slid into the upper section.
      > Unlike some other hiking poles, the Guide Ultra Light's locking
      > mechanism is not easily removed. To clean the pole, one must insert
      > the grip into a pot of boiling water. After a couple minutes, the
      > heat will loosen up the grips so that they can be pulled off the
      > pole. Once the grips are off, the locking mechanism can be removed
      > and cleaned. Unless one hikes with a Boy Scout Troop with an eight
      > quart pot, these poles are not easily field cleaned.
      > Mechanism">>
      > The benefit of having such a design is that if one has the optional
      > probe extender, the two carbon fiber lower sections can be converted
      > into an avalanche probe. I have not tried this in a snow field, but
      > in the comfort of my home, it takes me about a minute longer to
      > assemble than a dedicated probe.
      > I have had the locking mechanism fail several times. In all
      > instances, I had all my weight on one pole and that pole slowly began
      > collapsing. The sliding of the locking mechanism was very slow and
      > never resulted in a loss of balance. There were also times when the
      > upper and lower sections would get stuck while I was trying to adjust
      > the length. A gentle tap usually freed the sections. Cleaning the
      > locking mechanism and the interior of the aluminum upper section
      > usually fixed both problems.
      > After I broke the carbon fiber lower section, and when cleaning the
      > locking mechanism did not fix the sliding issues, I contacted Life-
      > Link customer support. They promptly sent out a replacement pole for
      > a small fee and sent replacement locking mechanisms under warranty.
      > SUMMARY
      > These poles are strong and reliable but cleaning the locking
      > mechanism is a hassle.
      > Durable Two Section Design
      > Good Customer Service
      > Ease of Use
      > Difficult to field clean
      > Strap is thick and bulky
      > Heesoo Chung
      > This report was created with the BGT Report Generator.
      > Copyright 2007. All rights reserved.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.