81033Edit/Approval: OR - tasc Boxer Briefs - Brett Haydin
- Mar 13 3:04 AMHi Brett,
Thanks for the Owner Review. (I see London, I see France ;-) I have a few edits for you. Once corrected you may place the review at
Reviews > Clothing > Underwear > tasc Performance Boxer Briefs
LOCATION Salida, CO, USA
EDIT: please spell out the state name for the benefit of our international readers
***Size Tested: Large (also available in small, medium, XL and XXL)
EDIT: sixe "reviewed" (we are testing a bucn of tasc products and don't want them confused)
*** The word "tasc" is repeated across the waistband as well.
Comment: personally I would inform the reader what tasc stands for at some point.
***The underwear is 14.5 in tall and 15.25 in wide (36.8 x 38.7 cm) so I am not sure where the reference to 6 comes into play.
Comment: it is the inseam length
***The manufacturer gave me a pair of the tasc Performance Boxer Briefs in August of 2011 at the Outdoor Retailer Summer Market show since I was intrigued by the use of bamboo as a fabric for underwear.
EDIT/comment: Jerry always told me not to mention getting an item from the OR Show. I have to assume that this still stands. I would suggest just saying, "I got the tasc Performance Boxer Briefs in August of 2011 as I was intrigued by the use of bamboo as a fabric for underwear."
*** where temperatures can dip to -15 F (-26 C) or lower not including wind chill factor
*** At the end of the day, the underwear is still as...supportive... as when I first put them on!
EDIT: use of the ellipsis does not work here. It is to signify an omission or something further is missing. I know what you are trying to convey, it just needs to be written differently. Maybe
the underwear is still as, uh, "supportive" as when I first put them on!
Comment: how is the waist band? Has it stretched or become "bacon-ed" at all?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>