74703EDIT: OWNER REVIEW - Life-Link Guide Ultra Light
- Nov 27, 2007Hello Heesoo,
This is a good first shot at an owner review. You have missed a few
points, but I feel sure that you will quickly address these. Please
don't forget to provide metric conversions for all measurements (and
to allow a space between measurement and unit for moth metric and
imperial, thus "12 oz" rather than "12oz").
Once corrected, I would like you to repost the text. The repost should
go to this list, with "REPOST" substituted where "EDIT" is presently
located in the message subject line.
An HTML version would be helpful--please post on the BGT website. You
will need to register or log on first, and upload to the TEST > OWNER
REVIEW folder. Let me know if you have any problems with this.
BGT OR Editor
>### EDIT: add POLES to the end of this. The review title should always
> LIFE-LINK GUIDE ULTRA LIGHT
indicate the type of gear under review.
> BY HEESOO CHUNG### EDIT: should be spelled out i.e. OWNER REVIEW
> November 16, 2007### EDIT (12 lb) -- leave a space between number and unit. Also, a
> TESTER INFORMATION
> NAME: Heesoo Chung
> EMAIL: chunghe2 (at) yahoo (dot) com
> AGE: 29
> LOCATION: Lenoir City, TN
> GENDER: M
> HEIGHT: 5' 11" (1.80 m)
> WEIGHT: 170 lb (77.10 kg)
> I started backpacking 14 years ago with the Boy
> Scouts. My backpack is currently on the lighter side
> (12lbs base weight)
metric conversion is needed here. The reason we have these is that BGT
has an international reader base (and a small percentage of the
manufacturers who test with us are non-US).
with the occasional luxury item
> thrown in (ex. a whole chocolate cake). I have done### EDIT: see note above
> week long trips in Colorado and Montana using
> traditional methods (20lbs base weight)
. I have also
> done trips with a SUL pack (5lbs### EDIT: see note above
base weight). I
> recently moved from Colorado to Tennessee but I am### EDIT: It's OK to quote the manufacturer's description as
> still hoping to do some cold weather backpacking this
> PRODUCT INFORMATION
> Manufacturer: Life-Link
> Year of Manufacture: 2004
> Manufacturer's Website: www.life-link.com
> MSRP: US$99.95
> Listed Weight: 14 oz (397 g) per pair
> Measured Weight: 16.5oz (468 g) per pair
> Other details:
> From manufacturer's website:
> " Lightweight foam grip with comfort strap
> Converts to an Avalanche probe 6'2" with probe
> Offered with optional self arrest Claw grip(s)
> Extends to 49" packs to 30"
> 3.5" powder basket
> Carbon Fiber lowers for ultimate swing weight
> Replaceable Carbide Flex Tip"
> "Why do flex tips break?
> Our Flex Tips are meant to "break-away" in extreme
> situations. The Flex Tip can bend up to 35 degrees if
> it's caught between rocks. This break-away feature
> protects your oh-so-light carbon shafts. After such an
> event you'll want to replace worn or broken Flex
necessary, but we also need yours. You do touch on this very briefly
under field use. The first paragraph there should really be part of
In a direct quote it's OK not to add metric conversions, but that's
all the more reason to use your own description. This would confirm
the manufacturer's claimed lengths, etc.
>### EDIT: Lacking here is an account of the range of conditions under
> FIELD USE
which these have been used. This should include temperature range,
terrain conditions (in the case of poles), weather, elevations etc.
The idea is to provide the reader with a good sense of how the regimen
under which you have used the poles matches their own use.
>### EDIT: Please exclude the mention of Leki. We avoid doing "shoot
> The Life-Link Guide Ultra Light is a two piece
> adjustable hiking pole that has an aluminum upper
> section and a lower section made of carbon fiber. The
> grip is made of foam and comes with a removable wrist
> The Guide Ultra Light is easily adjustable and has an
> agreeable swing weight. The grip and strap are
> comfortable and does not get saturated with sweat or
> get stinky. However, my preference would be a thinner
> The carbon fiber lowers are much more durable than
> expected. The poles feel quite solid and dampen
> vibrations well. The poles are not excessively noisy.
> They do not produce any odd clacks, boings, or wumps.
> These poles have been with me for the last three
> years. I have used them for snowshoe trips in
> Colorado, the Appalachian Trail, and in the Sierras.
> Around the first thousand miles of use, one of the
> tips got caught in a rock and broke. According to the
> manufacturers website, the carbide flex tip is
> designed to break before the more expensive carbon
> fiber section. The replacement tips cost $10 for a
> pair and were easy to replace.
> Around two thousand miles of use, I was scrambling
> down some slick boulders when I got the bottom 18
> inches caught in a crevice. The carbon fiber lower
> broke cleanly at the point of failure. The aluminum
> upper section bent in such a way that the carbon
> fiber section no longer slid into the upper section.
> Unlike the hiking poles made by Leki,
out" reviews, and while this is clearly not your intention here, the
mention of another manufacturer confuses the issue. If you wish, you
could write "Unlike some hiking poles from other manufacturers..."
Overall, though, this is a very good point.
the Guide Ultra
> Light's locking mechanism is not easily removed. To
> clean the pole, one must insert the grip into a pot of
> boiling water. After a couple minutes, the heat will
> loosen up the grips so that they can be pulled off the
> pole. Once the grips are off, the locking mechanism
> can be removed and cleaned. Unless one hikes with a
> Boy Scout Troop with an eight quart pot, these poles
> are not easily field cleaned.
> <<IMAGE GOES HERE. ALT TEXT = "IMAGE 1" IMAGE CAPTION
> = "Locking Mechanism">>
> The benefit of having such a design is that if one has
> the optional probe extender, the two carbon fiber
> lower sections can be converted into an avalanche
> probe. I have not tried this in a snow field, but in
> the comfort of my home, it takes me about a minute
> longer to assemble than a dedicated probe.
> I have had the locking mechanism fail several times.
> In all instances, I had all my weight on one pole and
> that pole slowly began collapsing. The sliding of the
> locking mechanism was very slow and never resulted in
> a loss of balance. There were also times when the
> upper and lower sections would get stuck while I was
> trying to adjust the length. A gentle tap usually
> freed the sections. Cleaning the locking mechanism and
> the interior of the aluminum upper section usually
> fixed both problems.
> After I broke the carbon fiber lower section, and when
> cleaning the locking mechanism did not fix the sliding
> issues, I contacted Life-Link customer support. They
> promptly sent out a replacement pole for a small fee
> and sent replacement locking mechanisms under
> These poles are strong and reliable but cleaning the
> locking mechanism is a hassle.
> THINGS I LIKE
> Durable Two Section Design
> Good Customer Service
> Ease of Use
> THINGS I DON'T LIKE
> Difficult to field clean
> Strap is thick and bulky
> Heesoo Chung
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>