66194Re: Re: EDIT: OR - Sea to Summit Thermolite Reactor - Ralph
- Apr 4, 2005Actually, the consensus we reached a while back is "no trademark symbols".
Period. It adds clutter and is not necessary. That being said... If
someone has them in their features list at the beginning of a review, they
probably are okay. If they appear everywhere throughout a review the
reviewer will be asked to remove them. If they aren't there... they
should never be asked to add them. Brand name capitalization should
always be correct... and edited accordingly.
BGT Edit Moderator
----- Forwarded by James E Triplett/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins on
04/04/2005 08:10 AM -----
James E Triplett/CedarRapids/RockwellCollins wrote on 04/04/2005 08:09:55
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 08:33:49 -0800[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> From: Nazdarovye <nazdarovye@...>
> Subject: Re: Re: EDIT: OR - Sea to Summit Thermolite Reactor - Ralph
> Thanks, Roger.
> There were two issues here: proper internal capitalization of DuPont,
> plus the ® symbol.
> My understanding is that the ® is supposed to be used with the first
> mention of a registered name in text, and may be omitted thereafter.
> In practice, many people omit it.
> - Steve
> On Apr 1, 2005, at 2:51 AM, rcaffin wrote:
> > Steve:
> >> Fabric : Thermolite by Dupont
> >> ***EDIT: "Thermolite® by DuPont"
> > I believe we do not really require the (R) symbol as it is legally
> > sufficient to capitalise the word Thermolite.
> > But it might be as well to check American requirements.
> > Cheers
> > Roger Caffin
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>