Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

60968Re: [BackpackGearTest] Re: RE: New file uploaded to BackpackGearTest.org by Jodi Cornelius

Expand Messages
  • Andrew Priest
    Nov 2, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      At 05:49 AM 2/11/2004, you wrote:
      >Fuzzy - I believe you are mistaken. Well, you are correct in that the
      >link is messed up. But I don't believe that the "<http://>http://" is
      >required in
      >uploaded reports, only in the e-mail reports in order to make the link
      >clickable. As long as the "<http://>http://" is part of the link (in the
      >HTML
      >version) then the text can stand alone as "www.hennessyhammocks.com" in
      >this case. This makes the URL easily readable, and if loaded correctly,
      >clickable as well.

      Hi Jet and Fuzzy

      >Jet is correct, either format is acceptable, however, my experience is
      >that frequently (way to frequently) URL in the format
      >"www.hennessyhammocks.com" does not work correctly on the website, if not
      >coded correctly. They often become "internal" links resulting in page not
      >found erros.


      Regards
      Andrew


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 9 messages in this topic