Re: [BPQ32] Traffic reports
On 2/14/2013 3:50 PM, John Wiseman wrote:If I change it I'll make it configurable.John
From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of K.O. Higgs
Sent: 14 February 2013 21:37
Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Traffic reports
If you make it "monthly", please make it also still available as a "weekly" report and in the same format as it now is for those of us that find it useful in its present form.
On 2/14/2013 12:56 PM, John Wiseman wrote:Dave,Making it monthly would be easy enough, but a breakdown by type would need more work. I'll look into it.73, John
From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Sent: 13 February 2013 20:46
Subject: [BPQ32] Traffic reports
Is there any possibility of setting up the weekly traffic reports to be
monthly and to break down the messages sent and received by type? (IE: P
B or T)
WB2HVF / AFA2HV
-- K.O. Higgs n0kfq@...
-- K.O. Higgs n0kfq@...
- Hi All,
To me it sounds like you are proposing a sort of Domain Name server for amateurs.
I have no problem with tha,t however what happens when the person running the server gets sick of it. or it uses to much bandwidth. At the moment the "wp servers" are distributed and if one goes off line there is (hopefully) another to seamlessly take over
What might be more pertinent is to actually look at the possible benefits getting rid of H-routes and utilising amprnet domain names or a normal internet name structure.
Regards Tony VK3API
----------------------------------------------------------------On 12/18/2013 7:51 AM, Sergej wrote:
Hello, John and group.
> Any comments for/against would be welcome. Also an indication of whether you
> would you the system would help.
> My current idea is that all WP updates would be sent as P messages to a
> central point which would consolidate them and send out an update to each
> bbs that subscibes to the system either regularly or on request.
So, based on central server structure. What other benefits will do server?
If we will use it only to complete p-mail's full address, it may be easier to
code in BBS software a request for users to type full address (h-route)
when sending p-messages to other bbs?
Its simple... Otherwise message will be indicated as local w/o need to route.
Indeed, in the internet e-mail system we write address completely,
such as user@..., but not just user@ or user@dom
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6926 - Release Date: 12/16/13