RE: [BPQ32] BPQAPRS
Thanks John… Will do … thanks!!!!! 73 jerry
I have an XP machine to run winmor on… it is stable.. thanks
Must USB serila ports are ok on Linux, but the way to be sure is plug it in and see if the ports are detected.
If you aren't already running BPQAPRS version 184.108.40.206 it might be worth trying ir - https://dl.dropbox.com/u/31910649/BPQAPRS.exe
WINMOR won't run under WINE, so the only option is to run it on a separate windows machine.
From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerome K
Sent: 13 February 2013 16:00
Subject: [BPQ32] BPQAPRS
Anyone know if the edge port 8 (8 serial port to USB) device will work on Linux…
I will need to move everything hardware wise over to linux and Want to use same PC I have now..
I will have to m ove my VWS Software to a Windoz machine or run it under WINE?? but that still interfaces with BPQ just fine via CSV file.
Now the big question… WINMOR… I take it I would have to run it under WINE..???
I am not well versed in Linux.. But have to get away from Windows as I cannot tollerate daily lockups again… I am back to where BPQAPRS locks up no less then every 1 to two days…
My JNOS machine running under linux has ran non stop except thru extended power outages that exceed my backup run time..
- Hi All,
To me it sounds like you are proposing a sort of Domain Name server for amateurs.
I have no problem with tha,t however what happens when the person running the server gets sick of it. or it uses to much bandwidth. At the moment the "wp servers" are distributed and if one goes off line there is (hopefully) another to seamlessly take over
What might be more pertinent is to actually look at the possible benefits getting rid of H-routes and utilising amprnet domain names or a normal internet name structure.
Regards Tony VK3API
----------------------------------------------------------------On 12/18/2013 7:51 AM, Sergej wrote:
Hello, John and group.
> Any comments for/against would be welcome. Also an indication of whether you
> would you the system would help.
> My current idea is that all WP updates would be sent as P messages to a
> central point which would consolidate them and send out an update to each
> bbs that subscibes to the system either regularly or on request.
So, based on central server structure. What other benefits will do server?
If we will use it only to complete p-mail's full address, it may be easier to
code in BBS software a request for users to type full address (h-route)
when sending p-messages to other bbs?
Its simple... Otherwise message will be indicated as local w/o need to route.
Indeed, in the internet e-mail system we write address completely,
such as user@..., but not just user@ or user@dom
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6926 - Release Date: 12/16/13