Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: RMS Packet, Linux RMS Gateway, BPQ32 - WL2K gateway updates needed

Expand Messages
  • Jeff - WA4ZKO
    Suspect some of the resistance to update past is the new MDI interface. I m in that camp sort of.... Not real crazy about the new node interface.
    Message 1 of 8 , Jan 11, 2013
      Suspect some of the resistance to update past is the new MDI interface. I'm in that camp sort of.... Not real crazy about the new node interface. Personal preference..I guess. Admittedly I haven't tried the latest version, but I found ran fine during stress testing and never saw a need to upgrade off it.

      I just run the newer BPQBBS modules on top of and keep the software admin headaches minimal. I have no need for the web, aprs, telnet, or Winlink features in the newer versions so I get that luxury ;-)

      I think there are several folks using a v4 BPQ32 version and very happy with it for their needs.

      Just making note that not everyone runs the "latest" are very happy with current setups/versions. Obviously folks that want to do Winlink or need the other features would be best served by upgrading.

      Once it is done I'll take a look at the Linux version. Sounds interesting, but I just don't have time for "beta" testing ;-)

      "Packet Radio never died, it just evolved."

      --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "John Wiseman" wrote:
      > Just to confirm the postion regarding WL2K compatibility
      > The Version 6.0.0.x series is an experimental Linux port of BPQ32, and is
      > being tested by a couple of stations
      > The latest released version of BPQ32 is, and ideally everyone should
      > update to that version.
      > Versions prior to do not have the latest WL2K reporting code, so if
      > you have any connectivity to WL2K and are running these, you need to update.
      > added the option to update the WL2K SYSOP record, so you should run
      > at least this version.
      > 73, John
      > _____
      > From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      > Loring Kutchins
      > Sent: 09 January 2013 17:10
      > To: PE1RDW
      > Cc: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com; lor@...
      > Subject: Re: [BPQ32] RMS Packet, Linux RMS Gateway, BPQ32 - WL2K gateway
      > updates needed
      > Thanks Andre, I'm aware of that, and I assume other BPQ users and sysops
      > know that too. John has been good to keep up with our improvements. It would
      > help more than hurt for sysops to move to 6.0.0. The ones using, and
      > those older ones not reporting to the web site (you can't see them, but
      > local users know them on-air) are the critical ones to reach.
      > Don't assume those you see in the report are all there are!
      > -Lor
      > On Jan 9, 2013, at 11:44 AM, PE1RDW pe1rdw@...
      > > wrote:
      > > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:31:47 +0100, Loring Kutchins lor@...
      > > wrote:
      > >
      > >> WL2K Users, Sysops. All,
      > >>
      > >> The Winlink Development Team's recent call for software updates has been
      > well received by HF sysops. All RMS Pactor and RMS WINMOR HF gates have
      > finally upgraded to RMS Trimode. These are now officially obsolete programs.
      > We locked them in the attic. But there are some sysops using old,
      > dysfunctional versions of BPQ32, Linux RMS Gateway, and RMS Packet. (188 as
      > of this morning.)
      > >>
      > >> We need your help to notify these sysops. Please look for your favorite
      > gateways in the "Need Upgrade" list at www.winlink.org/RMSVersions and drop
      > the sysop a request that he update. You can find the sysop's email address
      > by mousing over the callsign in the frequency list at
      > www.winlink.org/RMSChannels (if they appear there).
      > >>
      > >> Many of the older software versions can no longer make CMS connections or
      > will throw errors because we did away with keycodes last Spring. Some of
      > these may still be reporting to the website, however they will be impaired
      > if a user tries to make a connection through them. They may not properly
      > report themselves on frequency lists or maps. Left much longer without
      > becoming current, these stations will eventually fall over the edge of the
      > earth and disappear completely, as we continue needed CMS improvements. We
      > hope these sysops will perk up and stay aboard!
      > >>
      > >> We appreciate your help, and hope you understand that a small volunteer
      > team needs to "crowdsource" as much help as it can. Thanks!
      > >>
      > >> Lor W3QA
      > >> Winlink Development Team
      > >
      > > Lor,
      > >
      > > BPQ is the latest production version, version 6.0.0 is a
      > development version so nearly all of the listed BPQ32 stations are up to
      > date already.
      > >
      > > --
      > > 73 Andre PE1RDW
      > >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.