Re: [BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
- K.O. has hit the nail on the head, there.
I think of the WP bulls are a rather clumsy and inefficient cludge, to work around the demise of the real thing.
We gave up a lot when we gave up on using radio.
73 DE Charles, N5PVL
On 1/3/2013 9:20 AM, K.O. Higgs wrote:
Well, that's a bunch of BS. They were ALL p-mail in the beginning.
- Sorry, my carelessness here. I never intended to suggest type 'B' messages other than WP should be killedif they have noone to forward to. I assumed that would be usnderstood, as we were discussing WP messages.Until the next houskeeping cycle killed messages can still be read by the sysop if he really wants to.73, John
From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joel Yates
Sent: 03 January 2013 15:00
Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
Quote! I said REGULAR type B Bulletin messages. Due to the way John worded his message. I didn't say WP B messages.
...Joel N4JOASent via BlackBerry from T-MobileFrom: "Mark Taylor" <mtaylor@...>Sender: BPQ32@yahoogroups.comDate: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:03:57 -0600 (CST)To: <BPQ32@yahoogroups.com>ReplyTo: BPQ32@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
Why would a WP Update message be read locally?
>Regular type B Bulletin messages with no one to forward to should not be
>deleted immediately. As they can still be read locally.
> ... JoelN4JOA
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-MobileMessage-----
> Date:Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:02:52
> Subject:RE: [BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
>messages are killed after processing, type 'B' are kept until
> Type 'P' WP
> they havebeen forwarded to any stations you have routed them to. Once
> forwarded,they should be deleted by the next housekeeping cycle after
> lifetime has expired. I'll check why WP,1 doest get themremoved,
>them to should also
> I guess type 'B' messages that have noone to forward
> deleted immediately.
BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Subject:[BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
>is it that upon receipt of a WP message the BBS cannot process
> And, why
> file then DELETE it. For my users it is simply garbage that theyhave to
> scroll through to see interesting messages.Mark
> wrote:messages stored. They do seem to follow
>> My BBS has numerous WP Update
>> thelifetime rules, which is set at 5 days I think. At this time the
> oldestdates to Dec 30. Even though I have WP,1 in the TO box in the
>>Update messages for a specific
>> Is there any reason to keep the WP
>> lengthprocessed immediately on receipt? On a schedule?
> of time? Are they
>>exactly do they work? When is the shortest amount of time I must
> them? How can I automatically have them deleted at the expirationof that