Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [BPQ32] Re: 9600 baud packet instability

Expand Messages
  • Bill Vodall
    Thank you Jeff.. That s good info to keep on had. Bill
    Message 1 of 23 , Nov 16, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      Thank you Jeff.. That's good info to keep on had.

      Bill

      > 1.0x10-5 (or better) is good benchmark to look for on the RX BER at –50
      > dBm test and the TX "BER at 12-dB SINAD+30 dB" test. If a radio can't
      > perform well at those levels then good luck with it on the 9.6k airwaves.
      >
      > http://wx4j.com/Radio-TNC9600bInfoC.htm
    • Rick Nicholson
      That was with a Kantronics KPC-9612 and on a Timewave DSP-232USB. Rick/n9umj Sent from my iPhone
      Message 2 of 23 , Nov 16, 2012
      • 0 Attachment
        That was with a Kantronics KPC-9612 and on a Timewave DSP-232USB. 

        Rick/n9umj


        Sent from my iPhone

        On Nov 16, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...> wrote:

         

        > I agree totally, I've had the Dr235t in operation for a year and found its
        > performance on 9.6k nominal and unreliable as a backbone,
        > During heavy use the dr235t will distort the packets to the points they
        > cannot be decoded even at short distances.

        Is that with the built in 9k6 TNC or a "good" external TNC like the PK96?

        Thanks,
        Bill - WA7NWP

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.