Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [BPQ32] Re: UZ7HO Soundmodem? Or something else?

Expand Messages
  • Andre
    ... I think you missed the intention marc, I m not talking about agwtobpq, I m talking about connecting both digi_ned and bpq to soundmodem, bpq can use uz7ho
    Message 1 of 13 , Feb 21 10:13 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      Op 21-2-2012 18:50, marc_pd4u schreef:
      > Andre,
      >
      > Using AGWtoBPQ in combination with UZ7HO is not wrong, but will not result in having the benefit of the advantages that Andrej's soundmodem offers in L2 handling (dynamic MAXFRAME and packet collection).
      >
      > If you use the UZ7HO driver instead of using AGWtoBPQ in combination with UZ7HO's soundmodem, it will allow you to benefit from that L2 handling. That is why John made the driver in the first place...
      >
      > So UZ7HO's soundmodem "works" when using the AGWtoBPQ driver, but "works optimal" when BPQ's driver for UZ7HO soundmodem is used.
      >
      > Marc, PD4U
      >
      I think you missed the intention marc, I'm not talking about agwtobpq,
      I'm talking about connecting both digi_ned and bpq to soundmodem, bpq
      can use uz7ho driver and digi_ned uses the 'raw' or direct interface so
      bpq has the L2 handeling and digi_ned has the controll.

      73 Andre PE1RDW
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.