- I d like to see how well W2LK would work after an INET crash. About as good as DSTAR using Clearwire as a backbone and expecting it to work in a hurricane.Message 1 of 64 , Jan 10, 2012View SourceI'd like to see how well W2LK would work after an INET crash. About as good as DSTAR using Clearwire as a backbone and expecting it to work in a hurricane.
On Jan 10, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@...> wrote:
> The entire issue is routing traffic NOT a callsign locator. You can find out from QRZ or other places
> where a guy is.
The winlink2k folks put all the messages for everybody on all the
servers.. Trying to at least keep just folks addresses locally, even
as limited as WP is, is a good thing. Having to go to the web (QRZ,
etc) to look up an address is the last option.
Bill - WA7NWP
- Sorry, my carelessness here. I never intended to suggest type B messages other than WP should be killedif they have noone to forward to. I assumed that wouldMessage 64 of 64 , Jan 3, 2013View SourceSorry, my carelessness here. I never intended to suggest type 'B' messages other than WP should be killedif they have noone to forward to. I assumed that would be usnderstood, as we were discussing WP messages.Until the next houskeeping cycle killed messages can still be read by the sysop if he really wants to.73, John
From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joel Yates
Sent: 03 January 2013 15:00
Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
Quote! I said REGULAR type B Bulletin messages. Due to the way John worded his message. I didn't say WP B messages.
...Joel N4JOASent via BlackBerry from T-MobileFrom: "Mark Taylor" <mtaylor@...>Sender: BPQ32@yahoogroups.comDate: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:03:57 -0600 (CST)To: <BPQ32@yahoogroups.com>ReplyTo: BPQ32@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
Why would a WP Update message be read locally?
>Regular type B Bulletin messages with no one to forward to should not be
>deleted immediately. As they can still be read locally.
> ... JoelN4JOA
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-MobileMessage-----
> Date:Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:02:52
> Subject:RE: [BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
>messages are killed after processing, type 'B' are kept until
> Type 'P' WP
> they havebeen forwarded to any stations you have routed them to. Once
> forwarded,they should be deleted by the next housekeeping cycle after
> lifetime has expired. I'll check why WP,1 doest get themremoved,
>them to should also
> I guess type 'B' messages that have noone to forward
> deleted immediately.
BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Subject:[BPQ32] Re: WP Updates
>is it that upon receipt of a WP message the BBS cannot process
> And, why
> file then DELETE it. For my users it is simply garbage that theyhave to
> scroll through to see interesting messages.Mark
> wrote:messages stored. They do seem to follow
>> My BBS has numerous WP Update
>> thelifetime rules, which is set at 5 days I think. At this time the
> oldestdates to Dec 30. Even though I have WP,1 in the TO box in the
>>Update messages for a specific
>> Is there any reason to keep the WP
>> lengthprocessed immediately on receipt? On a schedule?
> of time? Are they
>>exactly do they work? When is the shortest amount of time I must
> them? How can I automatically have them deleted at the expirationof that