Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID

Expand Messages
  • ke7ugt@comcast.net
    Hi KO  OK You are right Thx for reply . It takes a while to learn this. 73 KE7UGT Rick ... From: K.O. Higgs To: BPQ32@ yahoogroups
    Message 1 of 53 , Aug 1, 2011
      Hi KO  OK You are right Thx for reply . It takes a while to learn this. 73 KE7UGT Rick


      From: "K.O. Higgs" <n0kfq@...>
      To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 11:21:04 AM
      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID

       

      Probably what you are seeing is the subject field of the messages in your Outlook Express program.
      If so, then they are all the same because they all reference the same original message which started that particular subject. The subjects of the messages may be all the same, but the message texts are not. Read a few of them and you will see what I mean.

      K.O. n0kfq

      On 7/31/2011 12:53 PM, ke7ugt@... wrote:
       
      Hi KO I just got started with Dales help on BPQ32 and I was wondering why I get your type of E-mail { the same E-mail} over and over as many as 6-7 times. I did not understand it the first time so would you tell me what you guys are talking About ? 73 KE7UGT Rick


      From: "K.O. Higgs" <n0kfq@...>
      To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 1:24:43 PM
      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID

       

      That is correct...
      K.O. n0kfq


      On 7/30/2011 3:11 PM, Joel Yates wrote:

      If the message bid is the same it should not matter. Joel N4JOA Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: "Mike Melnik" <mmelnik1@...>
      Sender: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:00:35 To: <BPQ32@yahoogroups.com>
      Reply-To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID I don't think BPQ-BBS sends out WP'S how ever this brings up the question is There really a difference between the two calls, the SSID wouldn't be included In a WP only the Base Call. Mike-N9PMO Web WWW.N9PMO.COM
      -----Original Message----- From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of K.O. Higgs Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:56 PM To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID My WP knows n9pmo and n4joa...... but not n9pmo-1 and n4joa-1. K.O. n0kfq On 7/30/2011 2:48 PM, Mike Melnik wrote:   Yes the same here FBB is N9PMO BPQMailChat is N9PMO-1 Mike-N9PMO Web WWW.N9PMO.COM
      -----Original Message----- From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Joel Yates Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:47 PM To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID I use N4JOA and N4JOA-1 Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile From: "K.O. Higgs" <n0kfq@...> 
      Sender: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com 
      Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 14:43:41 -0500 To: <BPQ32@yahoogroups.com>
      ReplyTo: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com 
      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID There shouldn't be TWO bbs's with the same callsign. WP would have an impossible(?) task keeping up with that. K.O.  n0kfq On 7/30/2011 2:33 PM, Mike Melnik wrote:   Seeing that may FBB BBS was involved in the discussion, my concern is running both FBB and BPQ-BBS and if a message is transferred from one to the other there shouldn't be a duplicate message, am I correct on this? And the BID/MID should remain the same? Mike-N9PMO Web WWW.N9PMO.COM
      -----Original Message----- From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Wiseman Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 3:14 AM To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID Sorry, K.O. Either I didn’t get the message, or my memory is worse than I thought it is! It seems a good idea. It would increase the message size, but is probably worth it. What do others think? 73, John   From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of K.O. Higgs Sent: 30 July 2011 00:59 To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Dupe bulletins with mangled BID   I have mentioned to John that it would be very useful in tracking down these problems if he would code the message bid in the station's R:Line...  but it hasn't happened yet. K.O. n0kfq On 7/29/2011 4:54 PM, Jeff - WA4ZKO wrote:   Been noticing some of my bulletins are turning up as dupes. >From reviewing the header of the dupe message that rolls back around later, it looks like someone upstream is sort of mangling the BID. It leaves my system with a BID of 7351_WA4ZKO but the dupe comes in with a BID of 7351-WA4ZKO: R:110729/2103Z 54231@KB8UVN.#CMH.OH.USA.NOAM BPQ1.0.4 R:110729/2028Z @:KB8UVN.#CMH.OH.USA.NOAM #:5036 [70574] FBB7.01.35 alpha R:110729/2023z @:AA6HF.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM Jnos2.0i #:79177 $:7351-wa4zko R:110729/2022Z @:WA7V.#SEWA.WA.USA.NOAM #:57415 [C-Basin Hub] $:7351-WA4ZKO R:110729 /2015Z @:CX2SA.LAV.URY.SA #:19072 [Minas] FBB7.00e $:7351-WA4ZKO R:110729/2012Z 40450@VE9MPF.#MCTN.NB.CAN.NOAM [Moncton, CAN] FBB7.00i R:110729/2009Z @:VE2PKT.#QBC.QC.CAN.NOAM #:55628 [Ste-Catherine_J.C] R:110729/2010Z 17272@N9PMO.#SEWI.WI.USA.NOAM [Racine, WI] FBB7.00i R:110729/2001Z @:N4ZKF.#NFL.FL.USA.NOAM #:28853 [28854] FBB7.01.35 alpha R:110729/1957Z 7351@WA4ZKO.#NKY.KY.USA.NOAM BPQ1.0.4 If I'm looking at this right, I would assume someone between N4ZKF and CX2SA is mangling the BID of my original bulletin and then creating a dupe? Thoughts? 73 Jeff WA4ZKO No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3796 - Release Date: 07/29/11
      
      

      -- K.O. Higgs 
      n0kfq@...
      
      

      No virus found in this message.
      Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3800 - Release Date: 07/31/11


      -- K.O. Higgs 
      n0kfq@...
      
      

    • ke7ugt@comcast.net
      SB Dale has been trying to reach you Rick ... From: ke7ugt@comcast.net To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2011 4:26:58 PM Subject: Re: [BPQ32]
      Message 53 of 53 , Aug 3, 2011
        SB Dale has been trying to reach you Rick


        From: ke7ugt@...
        To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2011 4:26:58 PM
        Subject: Re: [BPQ32] WHY

        another thought try and see if they will set you up with the computer so you will have it all and I think even HF when you are ready I send messages over the bulletin board. Outpost Snos and a lot more will connect to you. 73 Rick KE7UGT


        From: "S B" <yochanan1975@...>
        To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
        Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2011 6:49:32 PM
        Subject: Re: [BPQ32] WHY

         

        N9PMO,

        Well I have tried to interface it with my TNS in KISS mode to hopfully
        do some tcp-ip over packet, but I see that it may not be able to do
        that. I don't know very much about the software. I was just on your
        site looking at the BPQ32 links, and you are auctually the closest, I
        believe to me here in central michigan. How ever there seems to be NO
        posted nodes in my state.
        The long links I see, are they done via HF or the internet? I have a
        antenna up about 35 feet in a tree, a 5/8 wave J-Pole, so I certainly
        can't go large distances in 2 Meter with my 50 watt setup the way it
        is, and the crazy trees I have around here seem to block/reduce all ki
        nds of RF, cell phones or what ever.

        I would like to learn more about BPQ32 and see how I may be able to if
        possible hook into the network, but if there is internet nodes
        available that seems to be the only way I'd be able to partake in the
        chat/BBS stuff ;P

        73's KD8NCV

        I check EOC65 daily here as it's the place me and another ham chat
        back and forth.

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.