Re: [BPQ32] Re: BPQ32 Not Pactor 4
- This is all my fault, Danny, Charles, Jeff ... John, etc ...
I truly am sorry -- my feelings about high-data rates and their usage on amateur HF frequencies have not changed, but I certainly apologize for bringing my big mouth to this forum. We are doing too many great things here for this place to be distracted by me and my personal problem.
Forgive me if you can ... ignore me if you can't.
73 de Neil
From: "Danny PD0SNK" <pd0snk@...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:17:58 PM
Subject: [BPQ32] Re: BPQ32 Not Pactor 4Why dont you all use packet for this discusion.Many times i see this kind of stuff being done on a forum or yahoogroup ore something like it.Why do we not use our fine packet network ?Most of us have a bpq node and mailbox running..Or is it just that outlook(inet) is easier..And the pactor thing is a litlle of topic not ?73 Danny PD0SNK