Re: [BPQ32] Re: Still looking for RP station
- It's a simple reject and "poof" no longer an issue.
On Apr 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, "Jeff - WA4ZKO" <wa4zko@...> wrote:
"That's also a problem with internet forwarding, the end user thinks
it's all done via the net so he doesn't see a problem with posting 500K worth of 7plus."
I think some don't realize every bulletin they send does not have to be @WW ;-)
My stance? It's not just msg size over RF (HF in particular) issues, I'm not going to take the time to combine the incoming 7+ stuff to make sure it's legal content for RF. Music and pictures could easily be problematic content wise. Thus I choose to filter all the 7+ stuff off and gather many others do the same.
--- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "bolt637" <stevenstimpson581@...> wrote:
> I will try your callsign on 40 meters robust. Thanks for
> posting the log, that was really cool. It looks like I am
> rejecting everything, I usually don't but some
> guy posted over 50 bulletins to @WW
> containing song lyrics in a foreign language. That's
> also a problem with internet forwarding, the end user thinks
> it's all done via the net so he doesn't see a problem
> with posting 500K worth of 7plus.
> --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff - WA4ZKO" <wa4zko@> wrote:
> > Steven, when I'm up in New England I usually find I have two windows for 40m connects back home. Around 5-6am or wait till the late afternoon/evening. I usually have the best luck in the early evening.
> > Glad to see you're enjoying RP ;-) Will have my portable RP station going next week, so I'll have a lot more RP testing flexibility.
> > 73
> > Jeff
> > WA4ZKO
> > Checked my logs, see bits-n-pieces of you in there over the last few days: