Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

RE: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

Expand Messages
  • Jerry
    Jeff , I can only guess at what is going on based on recent transgressions.. I only have to ask because in less then one day my WINMOR BBS forwarding has been
    Message 1 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011

      Jeff ,

       

      I can only guess at what is going on based on recent transgressions..

       

      I only have to ask because in less then one day my WINMOR BBS forwarding has been totally devastated..

       

      “Are WL2K people threatening/complaining to WINMOR BBS Forwarding Stations or what.”  If they are bring it on..

       

      I base this also on the fact that within the last two weeks all WINMOR and PACKET RMS Reporting from BPQ32 has been deactivated, as well…

       

      I had two really good BBS forwarding Partners and as of today I have 0.. Besides the HF Skipnet these two were my primary feeds via WINMOR  … Now they are silenced.

       

      UGH.. Hate to see them go.. They were my two only winmor partners for BBS Forwarding, and reallu good covered most of the day and evenings between the two.  I Hope it was only coincidence.. As I have heard RUMORS that the WINLINK guys hated us doing BBS forwarding on 14.112 But that was hearsay from others whom I did not forward with.. So It could be false info..

       

      73 Jerry N9LYA

      Disappointed in the directions were  are moving…  I hope we can recover from losses such as these.. We need our HF RF Links. RF is the most important reality of all this..  

      SO much for buying a second Signal Link I see no need, no need at all.

       

      I too do not understand what is lacking but I was not involved with any conversations as to any wish list items he might have had.

       

       

      From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff - WA4ZKO
      Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:42 PM
      To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

       

       

      Mark,

      Hate to see you go.

      Curious about what you found lacking in BPQ? John has a pretty good track record of giving us what we want if he can. It looks like he has several "new" things in he works. Maybe it's already on his list or he can add your needs if not?

      While there are some loose ends needing work, I'm extremely happy with BPQ32 and BPQBBS. I have no worries that John will not finish up what remains as his time allows. Compared to other projects out there, things have come a long ways in a rather short period of time.

      73
      Jeff
      WA4ZKO

      --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "mtaylor_lrim" <mtaylor@...> wrote:
      >
      > To Jerry, N9LYA, Rich, KE7XO, and others...
      >
      >
      > I have shut down using BPQ because it simply will not do all that I ask of it, yet. Perhaps in the future John will incorporate the features that would make it more useful to me and will again start using it.
      >
      > Until then I will try and stay in touch and watch for updates.
      >
      >
      > Mark,
      > N5MDT
      >

    • Jeff - WA4ZKO
      Jerry, I ve got a posting I typed up over lunch, but I can t bring myself to press send on it yet. You know me, I tend to stir up hornets nests. Sometimes
      Message 2 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011
        Jerry,

        I've got a posting I typed up over lunch, but I can't bring myself to press "send" on it yet.

        You know me, I tend to stir up hornets nests. Sometimes that is is a needed thing (eg my reality check bombs). But too often folks just don't read my rants in their entirety and choose to focus on one sentence that struck a nerve. From there we both know where it goes ;-)

        As someone said, how about we just get back to playing radio and havin' fun ;-)


        73
        Jeff
        WA4ZKO

        --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:
        >
        > Jeff ,
        >
        >
        >
        > I can only guess at what is going on based on recent transgressions..
        >
        >
        >
        > I only have to ask because in less then one day my WINMOR BBS forwarding has
        > been totally devastated..
        >
        >
        >
        > "Are WL2K people threatening/complaining to WINMOR BBS Forwarding Stations
        > or what." If they are bring it on..
        >
        >
        >
        > I base this also on the fact that within the last two weeks all WINMOR and
        > PACKET RMS Reporting from BPQ32 has been deactivated, as well.
        >
        >
        >
        > I had two really good BBS forwarding Partners and as of today I have 0..
        > Besides the HF Skipnet these two were my primary feeds via WINMOR . Now
        > they are silenced.
        >
        >
        >
        > UGH.. Hate to see them go.. They were my two only winmor partners for BBS
        > Forwarding, and reallu good covered most of the day and evenings between the
        > two. I Hope it was only coincidence.. As I have heard RUMORS that the
        > WINLINK guys hated us doing BBS forwarding on 14.112 But that was hearsay
        > from others whom I did not forward with.. So It could be false info..
        >
        >
        >
        > 73 Jerry N9LYA
        >
        > Disappointed in the directions were are moving. I hope we can recover from
        > losses such as these.. We need our HF RF Links. RF is the most important
        > reality of all this..
        >
        > SO much for buying a second Signal Link I see no need, no need at all.
        >
        >
        >
        > I too do not understand what is lacking but I was not involved with any
        > conversations as to any wish list items he might have had.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
        > - WA4ZKO
        > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:42 PM
        > To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
        > Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > Mark,
        >
        > Hate to see you go.
        >
        > Curious about what you found lacking in BPQ? John has a pretty good track
        > record of giving us what we want if he can. It looks like he has several
        > "new" things in he works. Maybe it's already on his list or he can add your
        > needs if not?
        >
        > While there are some loose ends needing work, I'm extremely happy with BPQ32
        > and BPQBBS. I have no worries that John will not finish up what remains as
        > his time allows. Compared to other projects out there, things have come a
        > long ways in a rather short period of time.
        >
        > 73
        > Jeff
        > WA4ZKO
        >
        > --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BPQ32%40yahoogroups.com> ,
        > "mtaylor_lrim" <mtaylor@> wrote:
        > >
        > > To Jerry, N9LYA, Rich, KE7XO, and others...
        > >
        > >
        > > I have shut down using BPQ because it simply will not do all that I ask of
        > it, yet. Perhaps in the future John will incorporate the features that would
        > make it more useful to me and will again start using it.
        > >
        > > Until then I will try and stay in touch and watch for updates.
        > >
        > >
        > > Mark,
        > > N5MDT
        > >
        >
      • Jerry
        Well said jeff. Lets have fun.Radios on full and ready.. Looking for HF RF Forwarding Partners.. WINMOR or PACTOR I II III I scan and can modify my
        Message 3 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011

          Well said jeff.

           

          Lets have fun…Radios on full and ready..

           

          Looking for HF RF Forwarding Partners.. WINMOR or PACTOR I II III  I scan and can modify my frequencies to match any you are already using. FOR BBS Message forwarding.

           

           

          73 jerry n9lya

           

           

           

           

           

          From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff - WA4ZKO
          Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:05 PM
          To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
          Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

           

           

          Jerry,

          I've got a posting I typed up over lunch, but I can't bring myself to press "send" on it yet.

          You know me, I tend to stir up hornets nests. Sometimes that is is a needed thing (eg my reality check bombs). But too often folks just don't read my rants in their entirety and choose to focus on one sentence that struck a nerve. From there we both know where it goes ;-)

          As someone said, how about we just get back to playing radio and havin' fun ;-)

          73
          Jeff
          WA4ZKO

          --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:
          >
          > Jeff ,
          >
          >
          >
          > I can only guess at what is going on based on recent transgressions..
          >
          >
          >
          > I only have to ask because in less then one day my WINMOR BBS forwarding has
          > been totally devastated..
          >
          >
          >
          > "Are WL2K people threatening/complaining to WINMOR BBS Forwarding Stations
          > or what." If they are bring it on..
          >
          >
          >
          > I base this also on the fact that within the last two weeks all WINMOR and
          > PACKET RMS Reporting from BPQ32 has been deactivated, as well.
          >
          >
          >
          > I had two really good BBS forwarding Partners and as of today I have 0..
          > Besides the HF Skipnet these two were my primary feeds via WINMOR . Now
          > they are silenced.
          >
          >
          >
          > UGH.. Hate to see them go.. They were my two only winmor partners for BBS
          > Forwarding, and reallu good covered most of the day and evenings between the
          > two. I Hope it was only coincidence.. As I have heard RUMORS that the
          > WINLINK guys hated us doing BBS forwarding on 14.112 But that was hearsay
          > from others whom I did not forward with.. So It could be false info..
          >
          >
          >
          > 73 Jerry N9LYA
          >
          > Disappointed in the directions were are moving. I hope we can recover from
          > losses such as these.. We need our HF RF Links. RF is the most important
          > reality of all this..
          >
          > SO much for buying a second Signal Link I see no need, no need at all.
          >
          >
          >
          > I too do not understand what is lacking but I was not involved with any
          > conversations as to any wish list items he might have had.
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
          > - WA4ZKO
          > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:42 PM
          > To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
          > Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > Mark,
          >
          > Hate to see you go.
          >
          > Curious about what you found lacking in BPQ? John has a pretty good track
          > record of giving us what we want if he can. It looks like he has several
          > "new" things in he works. Maybe it's already on his list or he can add your
          > needs if not?
          >
          > While there are some loose ends needing work, I'm extremely happy with BPQ32
          > and BPQBBS. I have no worries that John will not finish up what remains as
          > his time allows. Compared to other projects out there, things have come a
          > long ways in a rather short period of time.
          >
          > 73
          > Jeff
          > WA4ZKO
          >
          > --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BPQ32%40yahoogroups.com> ,
          > "mtaylor_lrim" <mtaylor@> wrote:
          > >
          > > To Jerry, N9LYA, Rich, KE7XO, and others...
          > >
          > >
          > > I have shut down using BPQ because it simply will not do all that I ask of
          > it, yet. Perhaps in the future John will incorporate the features that would
          > make it more useful to me and will again start using it.
          > >
          > > Until then I will try and stay in touch and watch for updates.
          > >
          > >
          > > Mark,
          > > N5MDT
          > >
          >

        • yate4899@gmail.com
          That is why I only do VHF/UHF and internet packet . Hopefully I can stay out of trouble that way :-) N4JOA Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile ... From:
          Message 4 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011
            That is why I only do VHF/UHF and internet packet . Hopefully I can stay out of trouble that way :-) N4JOA

            Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile


            From: "Jerry" <n9lya@...>
            Sender: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
            Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:11:44 -0400
            To: <BPQ32@yahoogroups.com>
            ReplyTo: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: RE: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

            Well said jeff.

             

            Lets have fun…Radios on full and ready..

             

            Looking for HF RF Forwarding Partners.. WINMOR or PACTOR I II III  I scan and can modify my frequencies to match any you are already using. FOR BBS Message forwarding.

             

             

            73 jerry n9lya

             

             

             

             

             

            From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff - WA4ZKO
            Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:05 PM
            To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
            Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

             

             

            Jerry,

            I've got a posting I typed up over lunch, but I can't bring myself to press "send" on it yet.

            You know me, I tend to stir up hornets nests. Sometimes that is is a needed thing (eg my reality check bombs). But too often folks just don't read my rants in their entirety and choose to focus on one sentence that struck a nerve. From there we both know where it goes ;-)

            As someone said, how about we just get back to playing radio and havin' fun ;-)

            73
            Jeff
            WA4ZKO

            --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:
            >
            > Jeff ,
            >
            >
            >
            > I can only guess at what is going on based on recent transgressions..
            >
            >
            >
            > I only have to ask because in less then one day my WINMOR BBS forwarding has
            > been totally devastated..
            >
            >
            >
            > "Are WL2K people threatening/complaining to WINMOR BBS Forwarding Stations
            > or what." If they are bring it on..
            >
            >
            >
            > I base this also on the fact that within the last two weeks all WINMOR and
            > PACKET RMS Reporting from BPQ32 has been deactivated, as well.
            >
            >
            >
            > I had two really good BBS forwarding Partners and as of today I have 0..
            > Besides the HF Skipnet these two were my primary feeds via WINMOR . Now
            > they are silenced.
            >
            >
            >
            > UGH.. Hate to see them go.. They were my two only winmor partners for BBS
            > Forwarding, and reallu good covered most of the day and evenings between the
            > two. I Hope it was only coincidence.. As I have heard RUMORS that the
            > WINLINK guys hated us doing BBS forwarding on 14.112 But that was hearsay
            > from others whom I did not forward with.. So It could be false info..
            >
            >
            >
            > 73 Jerry N9LYA
            >
            > Disappointed in the directions were are moving. I hope we can recover from
            > losses such as these.. We need our HF RF Links. RF is the most important
            > reality of all this..
            >
            > SO much for buying a second Signal Link I see no need, no need at all.
            >
            >
            >
            > I too do not understand what is lacking but I was not involved with any
            > conversations as to any wish list items he might have had.
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
            > - WA4ZKO
            > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:42 PM
            > To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > Mark,
            >
            > Hate to see you go.
            >
            > Curious about what you found lacking in BPQ? John has a pretty good track
            > record of giving us what we want if he can. It looks like he has several
            > "new" things in he works. Maybe it's already on his list or he can add your
            > needs if not?
            >
            > While there are some loose ends needing work, I'm extremely happy with BPQ32
            > and BPQBBS. I have no worries that John will not finish up what remains as
            > his time allows. Compared to other projects out there, things have come a
            > long ways in a rather short period of time.
            >
            > 73
            > Jeff
            > WA4ZKO
            >
            > --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BPQ32%40yahoogroups.com> ,
            > "mtaylor_lrim" <mtaylor@> wrote:
            > >
            > > To Jerry, N9LYA, Rich, KE7XO, and others...
            > >
            > >
            > > I have shut down using BPQ because it simply will not do all that I ask of
            > it, yet. Perhaps in the future John will incorporate the features that would
            > make it more useful to me and will again start using it.
            > >
            > > Until then I will try and stay in touch and watch for updates.
            > >
            > >
            > > Mark,
            > > N5MDT
            > >
            >

          • DEC
            They don t want any competition from those yachts while trying to get their tax papers in! LOL! ... They don t want any competition from those yachts while
            Message 5 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011
              They don't want any competition from those yachts while trying to get their tax papers in! LOL!




              On Apr 1, 2011, at 3:11 PM, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:

               

              Well said jeff.

               

              Lets have fun…Radios on full and ready..

               

              Looking for HF RF Forwarding Partners.. WINMOR or PACTOR I II III  I scan and can modify my frequencies to match any you are already using. FOR BBS Message forwarding.

               

               

              73 jerry n9lya

               

               

               

               

               

              From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff - WA4ZKO
              Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:05 PM
              To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
              Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

               

               

              Jerry,

              I've got a posting I typed up over lunch, but I can't bring myself to press "send" on it yet.

              You know me, I tend to stir up hornets nests. Sometimes that is is a needed thing (eg my reality check bombs). But too often folks just don't read my rants in their entirety and choose to focus on one sentence that struck a nerve. From there we both know where it goes ;-)

              As someone said, how about we just get back to playing radio and havin' fun ;-)

              73
              Jeff
              WA4ZKO

              --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:
              >
              > Jeff ,
              >
              >
              >
              > I can only guess at what is going on based on recent transgressions..
              >
              >
              >
              > I only have to ask because in less then one day my WINMOR BBS forwarding has
              > been totally devastated..
              >
              >
              >
              > "Are WL2K people threatening/complaining to WINMOR BBS Forwarding Stations
              > or what." If they are bring it on..
              >
              >
              >
              > I base this also on the fact that within the last two weeks all WINMOR and
              > PACKET RMS Reporting from BPQ32 has been deactivated, as well.
              >
              >
              >
              > I had two really good BBS forwarding Partners and as of today I have 0..
              > Besides the HF Skipnet these two were my primary feeds via WINMOR . Now
              > they are silenced.
              >
              >
              >
              > UGH.. Hate to see them go.. They were my two only winmor partners for BBS
              > Forwarding, and reallu good covered most of the day and evenings between the
              > two. I Hope it was only coincidence.. As I have heard RUMORS that the
              > WINLINK guys hated us doing BBS forwarding on 14.112 But that was hearsay
              > from others whom I did not forward with.. So It could be false info..
              >
              >
              >
              > 73 Jerry N9LYA
              >
              > Disappointed in the directions were are moving. I hope we can recover from
              > losses such as these.. We need our HF RF Links. RF is the most important
              > reality of all this..
              >
              > SO much for buying a second Signal Link I see no need, no need at all.
              >
              >
              >
              > I too do not understand what is lacking but I was not involved with any
              > conversations as to any wish list items he might have had.
              >
              >
              >
              >
              >
              > From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
              > - WA4ZKO
              > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:42 PM
              > To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
              > Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ
              >
              >
              >
              >
              >
              > Mark,
              >
              > Hate to see you go.
              >
              > Curious about what you found lacking in BPQ? John has a pretty good track
              > record of giving us what we want if he can. It looks like he has several
              > "new" things in he works. Maybe it's already on his list or he can add your
              > needs if not?
              >
              > While there are some loose ends needing work, I'm extremely happy with BPQ32
              > and BPQBBS. I have no worries that John will not finish up what remains as
              > his time allows. Compared to other projects out there, things have come a
              > long ways in a rather short period of time.
              >
              > 73
              > Jeff
              > WA4ZKO
              >
              > --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BPQ32%40yahoogroups.com> ,
              > "mtaylor_lrim" <mtaylor@> wrote:
              > >
              > > To Jerry, N9LYA, Rich, KE7XO, and others...
              > >
              > >
              > > I have shut down using BPQ because it simply will not do all that I ask of
              > it, yet. Perhaps in the future John will incorporate the features that would
              > make it more useful to me and will again start using it.
              > >
              > > Until then I will try and stay in touch and watch for updates.
              > >
              > >
              > > Mark,
              > > N5MDT
              > >
              >

            • DEC
              My 20 meter port was up an running on packet before they knew what digital was. I m not going anywhere. It will take more than their constant carrier QRMing us
              Message 6 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011
                My 20 meter port was up an running on packet before they knew what digital was. I'm not going anywhere. It will take more than their constant carrier QRMing us to make me go away.




                On Apr 1, 2011, at 3:43 PM, yate4899@... wrote:

                 

                That is why I only do VHF/UHF and internet packet . Hopefully I can stay out of trouble that way :-) N4JOA

                Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile


                From: "Jerry" <n9lya@...>
                Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 15:11:44 -0400
                Subject: RE: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                Well said jeff.

                 

                Lets have fun…Radios on full and ready..

                 

                Looking for HF RF Forwarding Partners.. WINMOR or PACTOR I II III  I scan and can modify my frequencies to match any you are already using. FOR BBS Message forwarding.

                 

                 

                73 jerry n9lya

                 

                 

                 

                 

                 

                From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff - WA4ZKO
                Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:05 PM
                To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                 

                 

                Jerry,

                I've got a posting I typed up over lunch, but I can't bring myself to press "send" on it yet.

                You know me, I tend to stir up hornets nests. Sometimes that is is a needed thing (eg my reality check bombs). But too often folks just don't read my rants in their entirety and choose to focus on one sentence that struck a nerve. From there we both know where it goes ;-)

                As someone said, how about we just get back to playing radio and havin' fun ;-)

                73
                Jeff
                WA4ZKO

                --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:
                >
                > Jeff ,
                >
                >
                >
                > I can only guess at what is going on based on recent transgressions..
                >
                >
                >
                > I only have to ask because in less then one day my WINMOR BBS forwarding has
                > been totally devastated..
                >
                >
                >
                > "Are WL2K people threatening/complaining to WINMOR BBS Forwarding Stations
                > or what." If they are bring it on..
                >
                >
                >
                > I base this also on the fact that within the last two weeks all WINMOR and
                > PACKET RMS Reporting from BPQ32 has been deactivated, as well.
                >
                >
                >
                > I had two really good BBS forwarding Partners and as of today I have 0..
                > Besides the HF Skipnet these two were my primary feeds via WINMOR . Now
                > they are silenced.
                >
                >
                >
                > UGH.. Hate to see them go.. They were my two only winmor partners for BBS
                > Forwarding, and reallu good covered most of the day and evenings between the
                > two. I Hope it was only coincidence.. As I have heard RUMORS that the
                > WINLINK guys hated us doing BBS forwarding on 14.112 But that was hearsay
                > from others whom I did not forward with.. So It could be false info..
                >
                >
                >
                > 73 Jerry N9LYA
                >
                > Disappointed in the directions were are moving. I hope we can recover from
                > losses such as these.. We need our HF RF Links. RF is the most important
                > reality of all this..
                >
                > SO much for buying a second Signal Link I see no need, no need at all.
                >
                >
                >
                > I too do not understand what is lacking but I was not involved with any
                > conversations as to any wish list items he might have had.
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
                > - WA4ZKO
                > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:42 PM
                > To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                > Subject: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > Mark,
                >
                > Hate to see you go.
                >
                > Curious about what you found lacking in BPQ? John has a pretty good track
                > record of giving us what we want if he can. It looks like he has several
                > "new" things in he works. Maybe it's already on his list or he can add your
                > needs if not?
                >
                > While there are some loose ends needing work, I'm extremely happy with BPQ32
                > and BPQBBS. I have no worries that John will not finish up what remains as
                > his time allows. Compared to other projects out there, things have come a
                > long ways in a rather short period of time.
                >
                > 73
                > Jeff
                > WA4ZKO
                >
                > --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BPQ32%40yahoogroups.com> ,
                > "mtaylor_lrim" <mtaylor@> wrote:
                > >
                > > To Jerry, N9LYA, Rich, KE7XO, and others...
                > >
                > >
                > > I have shut down using BPQ because it simply will not do all that I ask of
                > it, yet. Perhaps in the future John will incorporate the features that would
                > make it more useful to me and will again start using it.
                > >
                > > Until then I will try and stay in touch and watch for updates.
                > >
                > >
                > > Mark,
                > > N5MDT
                > >
                >

              • W6IDS
                HUH? constant carrier ??? What is that? Howard W6IDS ... From: DEC To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:44 PM Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re:
                Message 7 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011
                  
                  HUH?  "constant carrier"???  What is that?
                   
                  Howard W6IDS
                   
                   
                   
                  ----- Original Message -----
                  From: DEC
                  Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:44 PM
                  Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                   

                  My 20 meter port was up an running on packet before they knew what digital was. I'm not going anywhere. It will take more than their constant carrier QRMing us to make me go away.



                • Jerry
                  On our HF Packet nets we suffer from QRM… Some we believe is from the Propnet a few rough stations that do not follow the Propnet Freq list now power
                  Message 8 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011

                    On our HF Packet nets we suffer from QRM… Some we believe is from the Propnet a few rough stations that do not follow the Propnet Freq list now power levels.. and just beacon constantly..

                     

                    Also on our HF Skipnets we have someone very occasionally just sitting there sending connect requests over and over and over.. Either they have retries set at 1.5M or they are sitting there for 8 to 12 hours calling and calling and calling…

                     

                    73 jerry

                     

                    From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W6IDS
                    Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:19 PM
                    To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                    Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                     

                     

                    

                    HUH?  "constant carrier"???  What is that?

                     

                    Howard W6IDS

                     

                     

                     

                    ----- Original Message -----

                    From: DEC

                    Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:44 PM

                    Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                     

                     

                    My 20 meter port was up an running on packet before they knew what digital was. I'm not going anywhere. It will take more than their constant carrier QRMing us to make me go away.

                     

                     

                  • Jerry
                    Actually… We have worked with Pactor and others who may operate on or near our skipnet and not had problems.. They general come in call a station pass some
                    Message 9 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011

                      Actually… We have worked with Pactor and others who may operate on or near  our skipnet and not had problems.. They general come in call a station pass some traffic and are gone.. What SEEMS to be happening now is either a new HAM who may need guidance,  a REAL LID  or a malicious attempt to shut us down… as Dave said.. I can run Packet until the last electron flows thru this station they will not run us off..

                       

                      This morning it was happening on two of our nets at the same time.. Just seems odd it is always nothing more than calling calling calling.. Total waste of effort of any kind regardless if it is attempted to be legit or malicious..

                       

                       

                      It comes and goes.. Just a general pain in the Transistors… 

                       

                       

                      73 jerry

                       

                      From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerry
                      Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:25 PM
                      To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                      Subject: RE: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                       

                       

                      On our HF Packet nets we suffer from QRM… Some we believe is from the Propnet a few rough stations that do not follow the Propnet Freq list now power levels.. and just beacon constantly..

                       

                      Also on our HF Skipnets we have someone very occasionally just sitting there sending connect requests over and over and over.. Either they have retries set at 1.5M or they are sitting there for 8 to 12 hours calling and calling and calling…

                       

                      73 jerry

                       

                      From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W6IDS
                      Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:19 PM
                      To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                       

                       

                      

                      HUH?  "constant carrier"???  What is that?

                       

                      Howard W6IDS

                       

                       

                       

                      ----- Original Message -----

                      From: DEC

                      Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:44 PM

                      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                       

                       

                      My 20 meter port was up an running on packet before they knew what digital was. I'm not going anywhere. It will take more than their constant carrier QRMing us to make me go away.

                       

                       

                    • DEC
                      Let em waste the electricity. Eventually we get it all, thru anyway! LOL! 73 Dave ... Let em waste the electricity. Eventually we get it all, thru anyway! LOL!
                      Message 10 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011
                        Let em waste the electricity. Eventually we get it all, thru anyway! LOL!

                        73 Dave




                        On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:39 PM, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:

                         

                        Actually… We have worked with Pactor and others who may operate on or near  our skipnet and not had problems.. They general come in call a station pass some traffic and are gone.. What SEEMS to be happening now is either a new HAM who may need guidance,  a REAL LID  or a malicious attempt to shut us down… as Dave said.. I can run Packet until the last electron flows thru this station they will not run us off..

                         

                        This morning it was happening on two of our nets at the same time.. Just seems odd it is always nothing more than calling calling calling.. Total waste of effort of any kind regardless if it is attempted to be legit or malicious..

                         

                         

                        It comes and goes.. Just a general pain in the Transistors… 

                         

                         

                        73 jerry

                         

                        From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerry
                        Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:25 PM
                        To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: RE: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                         

                         

                        On our HF Packet nets we suffer from QRM… Some we believe is from the Propnet a few rough stations that do not follow the Propnet Freq list now power levels.. and just beacon constantly..

                         

                        Also on our HF Skipnets we have someone very occasionally just sitting there sending connect requests over and over and over.. Either they have retries set at 1.5M or they are sitting there for 8 to 12 hours calling and calling and calling…

                         

                        73 jerry

                         

                        From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W6IDS
                        Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:19 PM
                        To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                         

                         

                        

                        HUH?  "constant carrier"???  What is that?

                         

                        Howard W6IDS

                         

                         

                         

                        ----- Original Message -----

                        From: DEC

                        Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:44 PM

                        Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                         

                         

                        My 20 meter port was up an running on packet before they knew what digital was. I'm not going anywhere. It will take more than their constant carrier QRMing us to make me go away.

                         

                         

                      • Jerry
                        Yes we do… Good job DAVE… 73 jerry From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of DEC Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:46 PM To:
                        Message 11 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011

                          Yes we do… Good job DAVE… 73 jerry

                           

                          From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of DEC
                          Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:46 PM
                          To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                          Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                           

                           

                          Let em waste the electricity. Eventually we get it all, thru anyway! LOL!

                           

                          73 Dave

                           

                           


                          On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:39 PM, "Jerry" <n9lya@...> wrote:

                           

                          Actually… We have worked with Pactor and others who may operate on or near  our skipnet and not had problems.. They general come in call a station pass some traffic and are gone.. What SEEMS to be happening now is either a new HAM who may need guidance,  a REAL LID  or a malicious attempt to shut us down… as Dave said.. I can run Packet until the last electron flows thru this station they will not run us off..

                           

                          This morning it was happening on two of our nets at the same time.. Just seems odd it is always nothing more than calling calling calling.. Total waste of effort of any kind regardless if it is attempted to be legit or malicious..

                           

                           

                          It comes and goes.. Just a general pain in the Transistors… 

                           

                           

                          73 jerry

                           

                          From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerry
                          Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:25 PM
                          To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                          Subject: RE: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                           

                           

                          On our HF Packet nets we suffer from QRM… Some we believe is from the Propnet a few rough stations that do not follow the Propnet Freq list now power levels.. and just beacon constantly..

                           

                          Also on our HF Skipnets we have someone very occasionally just sitting there sending connect requests over and over and over.. Either they have retries set at 1.5M or they are sitting there for 8 to 12 hours calling and calling and calling…

                           

                          73 jerry

                           

                          From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W6IDS
                          Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:19 PM
                          To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                          Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                           

                           

                          

                          HUH?  "constant carrier"???  What is that?

                           

                          Howard W6IDS

                           

                           

                           

                          ----- Original Message -----

                          From: DEC

                          Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:44 PM

                          Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                           

                           

                          My 20 meter port was up an running on packet before they knew what digital was. I'm not going anywhere. It will take more than their constant carrier QRMing us to make me go away.

                           

                           

                        • Jerry
                          Thanks for the time you were on with us.. It was greatly appreciated. 73 Jerry Yell if you do return.. From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                          Message 12 of 21 , Apr 1, 2011

                            Thanks for the time you were on with us.. It was greatly appreciated…

                             

                            73 Jerry

                             

                            Yell if you do return..

                             

                            From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mtaylor_lrim
                            Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 12:09 PM
                            To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                            Subject: [BPQ32] N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                             

                             

                            To Jerry, N9LYA, Rich, KE7XO, and others...

                            I have shut down using BPQ because it simply will not do all that I ask of it, yet. Perhaps in the future John will incorporate the features that would make it more useful to me and will again start using it.

                            Until then I will try and stay in touch and watch for updates.

                            Mark,
                            N5MDT

                          • Charles Brabham
                            He s probably referring to malicious interference, typically coming from Winlinkers who read something on the internet that they didn t like. In my experience,
                            Message 13 of 21 , Apr 2, 2011
                              
                              He's probably referring to malicious interference, typically coming from Winlinkers who read something on the internet that they didn't like.
                               
                              In my experience, whenever anybody speaks up about their lid-like operating habits online - they arrainge for a little extra bit of interference on the frequency being talked about.
                               
                              It's the only tool in their little toolbox. - It's what they know how to do best.
                               
                              There was one occasion where it didn't work out that way though, so not all hope is lost.
                               
                              Attend carefully:
                               
                              One day, after watching WinLinkers crash my Packet QSOs for years on 14.098 ( Notice how I don't worry about listing the frequency? )
                              I decided to start documenting the interference.
                               
                              Using screenshots to document the waterfall action, and MixW's PACTOR I rx capability to gather callsigns of offending WinLink client stations callsigns ( when they used callsigns ) within a few weeks, I had documentation and ID's related to over seventy-five interference events.
                               
                              The WinLink 'leadership' was blaming the inteference on the client stations instead of the servers at that time, so I took him at his word and concentrated on the client stations.
                               
                              My criteria was that the station had to actually transmit right on top of an ongoing QSO, and I had to personally witness the event. - Just being on frequrency when it was clear did not qualify a Winlink client for the lid-list.
                               
                              They had to be obvious, easy to document lids.
                               
                              Then I started publishing my screen-shots and my Lid-list on QRZed.com.
                               
                              There were flustered protestations of innocence, ( in the face of incontrovertable evidence ) redefinitions of the word "is", and of course I was called every name in the book and got all kinds of nasty-grams in my email inbox.
                               
                              The old "I didn't hear it" excuse did not fly in the face of over seventy-five interference events within a couple of weeks. The claim of not being able to hear a Packet net that included stations all over the US didn't go over very well, either.
                               
                              For a few days after that, there were TONS of Winlink interference events on 14.098 - but it tapered off very quickly because...
                               
                              Lo-and Behold! - WinLink clients didn't want to be spotlighted as lids on on QRZed, and started avoiding 14.098. - A good 70% of the interference went away - and it stayed that way. Today, five years later, there is still significantly less WinLink interference on that frequency, compared to lets say, 14.105 or any of the other automated packet sub-bands.
                               
                              The WB0TAX server is still stubbornly parked there after all these years - but he doesn't get much business on that frequency.  :-)
                               
                              I realize of course that I'll probably see some extra interference on 14.098 after posting this, but you know what?
                               
                              I also know that it won't last very long at all - for the obvious reason.
                               
                              I did this - and so can anyone else.
                               
                               
                              73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
                               
                              Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at HamRadioNet.Org !
                               
                               
                               
                               
                              ----- Original Message -----
                              From: W6IDS
                              Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:19 PM
                              Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                               

                              

                              HUH?  "constant carrier"???  What is that?
                               
                              Howard W6IDS
                               
                            • Rick Muething
                              Thank you for your brilliant and fresh observations Charles....But no need to bother to sign your name and call sign. Your bias, rants and distortions of the
                              Message 14 of 21 , Apr 2, 2011
                                Thank you for your brilliant and fresh observations Charles....But no need to bother to sign your name and call sign. Your bias, rants and distortions of the truth are so well know by all that it makes it unnecessary.  IMHO it just adds credibility to the saying...Those that CAN...DO....those that can’t DO blog.
                                 
                                Rick Muething, KN6KB
                                 
                                 
                              • Mike Brogan
                                Don t really think this sort of discussion belongs on this list at all!! Mike, g8jhe........ ... From: Rick Muething To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com Sent:
                                Message 15 of 21 , Apr 2, 2011
                                  Don't really think this sort of "discussion" belongs on this list at all!!

                                  Mike, g8jhe........


                                  ----- Original Message -----
                                  From: Rick Muething
                                  To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                                  Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:04 PM
                                  Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Lid List_ (Was N5MDT stopping use of BPQ)





                                  Thank you for your brilliant and fresh observations Charles....But no need
                                  to bother to sign your name and call sign. Your bias, rants and
                                  distortions of the truth are so well know by all that it makes it
                                  unnecessary. IMHO it just adds credibility to the saying...Those that
                                  CAN...DO....those that can’t DO blog.

                                  Rick Muething, KN6KB








                                  -----
                                  No virus found in this message.
                                  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
                                  Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3546 - Release Date: 04/02/11
                                • yate4899@gmail.com
                                  Thank You Mike. I agree. Joel N4JOA Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile ... From: Mike Brogan Sender: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com Date: Sat, 2
                                  Message 16 of 21 , Apr 2, 2011
                                    Thank You Mike. I agree. Joel N4JOA
                                    Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: "Mike Brogan" <g8jhe@...>
                                    Sender: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                                    Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:37:27
                                    To: BPQ32@...<BPQ32@yahoogroups.com>
                                    Reply-To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                                    Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Lid List_ (Was N5MDT stopping use of BPQ)

                                    Don't really think this sort of "discussion" belongs on this list at all!!

                                    Mike, g8jhe........


                                    ----- Original Message -----
                                    From: Rick Muething
                                    To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                                    Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:04 PM
                                    Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Lid List_ (Was N5MDT stopping use of BPQ)





                                    Thank you for your brilliant and fresh observations Charles....But no need
                                    to bother to sign your name and call sign. Your bias, rants and
                                    distortions of the truth are so well know by all that it makes it
                                    unnecessary. IMHO it just adds credibility to the saying...Those that
                                    CAN...DO....those that can’t DO blog.

                                    Rick Muething, KN6KB








                                    -----
                                    No virus found in this message.
                                    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
                                    Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3546 - Release Date: 04/02/11



                                    ------------------------------------

                                    Yahoo! Groups Links
                                  • W6IDS
                                    Know what else? I hit the DEL key and it isn t there - oops, did the same thing to yours and Joel s. . . POOOF! Gone. No worries. Cheers - Howard
                                    Message 17 of 21 , Apr 2, 2011
                                      
                                       
                                      Know what else?  I hit the DEL key and it isn't there -
                                       
                                      oops, did the same thing to yours and Joel's. . . POOOF!
                                       
                                      Gone.  No worries.  <GRIN>  Cheers -
                                       
                                      Howard W6IDS
                                      Richmond, IN Em79NV
                                       
                                      I guess now I'm sending to no one. . . . <SIGH>
                                      I still want Fish 'n Chips!
                                      ----- Original Message -----
                                      Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 1:37 PM
                                      Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Lid List_ (Was N5MDT stopping use of BPQ)

                                       

                                      Don't really think this sort of "discussion" belongs on this list at all!!

                                      Mike, g8jhe........

                                    • Rick Nicholson
                                      No come on guys... it can t be that bad?    If it is, then settle it like men....pistols at at 100 paces.  I thought this hobby was suppose to be fun? 73 s
                                      Message 18 of 21 , Apr 2, 2011
                                        No come on guys... it can't be that bad?    If it is, then settle it like men....pistols at at 100 paces. 
                                         
                                        I thought this hobby was suppose to be fun?
                                         
                                        73's to both sides of the dispute!
                                         
                                        Hope you all get over it soon!!

                                        From: Rick Muething <rmuething@...>
                                        To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
                                        Sent: Sat, April 2, 2011 1:04:51 PM
                                        Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Lid List_ (Was N5MDT stopping use of BPQ)

                                         

                                        Thank you for your brilliant and fresh observations Charles....But no need to bother to sign your name and call sign. Your bias, rants and distortions of the truth are so well know by all that it makes it unnecessary.  IMHO it just adds credibility to the saying...Those that CAN...DO....those that can’t DO blog.
                                         
                                        Rick Muething, KN6KB
                                         
                                         
                                      • DEC
                                        And you actually knew the freq. I was talking about. Imagine that. :) 73 Dave ... And you actually knew the freq. I was talking about. Imagine that. :) 73 Dave
                                        Message 19 of 21 , Apr 2, 2011
                                          And you actually knew the freq. I was talking about. Imagine that. :)


                                          73 Dave




                                          On Apr 2, 2011, at 8:40 AM, "Charles Brabham" <n5pvl@...> wrote:

                                           

                                          

                                          He's probably referring to malicious interference, typically coming from Winlinkers who read something on the internet that they didn't like.
                                           
                                          In my experience, whenever anybody speaks up about their lid-like operating habits online - they arrainge for a little extra bit of interference on the frequency being talked about.
                                           
                                          It's the only tool in their little toolbox. - It's what they know how to do best.
                                           
                                          There was one occasion where it didn't work out that way though, so not all hope is lost.
                                           
                                          Attend carefully:
                                           
                                          One day, after watching WinLinkers crash my Packet QSOs for years on 14.098 ( Notice how I don't worry about listing the frequency? )
                                          I decided to start documenting the interference.
                                           
                                          Using screenshots to document the waterfall action, and MixW's PACTOR I rx capability to gather callsigns of offending WinLink client stations callsigns ( when they used callsigns ) within a few weeks, I had documentation and ID's related to over seventy-five interference events.
                                           
                                          The WinLink 'leadership' was blaming the inteference on the client stations instead of the servers at that time, so I took him at his word and concentrated on the client stations.
                                           
                                          My criteria was that the station had to actually transmit right on top of an ongoing QSO, and I had to personally witness the event. - Just being on frequrency when it was clear did not qualify a Winlink client for the lid-list.
                                           
                                          They had to be obvious, easy to document lids.
                                           
                                          Then I started publishing my screen-shots and my Lid-list on QRZed.com.
                                           
                                          There were flustered protestations of innocence, ( in the face of incontrovertable evidence ) redefinitions of the word "is", and of course I was called every name in the book and got all kinds of nasty-grams in my email inbox.
                                           
                                          The old "I didn't hear it" excuse did not fly in the face of over seventy-five interference events within a couple of weeks. The claim of not being able to hear a Packet net that included stations all over the US didn't go over very well, either.
                                           
                                          For a few days after that, there were TONS of Winlink interference events on 14.098 - but it tapered off very quickly because...
                                           
                                          Lo-and Behold! - WinLink clients didn't want to be spotlighted as lids on on QRZed, and started avoiding 14.098. - A good 70% of the interference went away - and it stayed that way. Today, five years later, there is still significantly less WinLink interference on that frequency, compared to lets say, 14.105 or any of the other automated packet sub-bands.
                                           
                                          The WB0TAX server is still stubbornly parked there after all these years - but he doesn't get much business on that frequency.  :-)
                                           
                                          I realize of course that I'll probably see some extra interference on 14.098 after posting this, but you know what?
                                           
                                          I also know that it won't last very long at all - for the obvious reason.
                                           
                                          I did this - and so can anyone else.
                                           
                                           
                                          73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL
                                           
                                          Prefer to use radio for your amateur radio communications? - Stop by at HamRadioNet.Org !
                                           
                                           
                                           
                                           
                                          ----- Original Message -----
                                          From: W6IDS
                                          Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 6:19 PM
                                          Subject: Re: [BPQ32] Re: N5MDT stopping use of BPQ

                                           

                                          

                                          HUH?  "constant carrier"???  What is that?
                                           
                                          Howard W6IDS
                                           

                                        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.