Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

9299RE: [BPQ32] Re: 9600 baud packet instability

Expand Messages
  • Mike
    Nov 15, 2012
      I use a Kantronics 9612 with a 19200 Baud serial link, the serial link
      must be
      Higher then the Radio speed.

      I modified a Motorola Syntor UHF 55 watt radio for 9600 BUAD
      Paclen 236, Maxframe 2, Frack 3000, response 1000, TXD 150

      Many radios that claim to be 9600 BUAD have a very slow turn around time
      TX/RX many are higher then 300ms Alinco happens to be one of those

      The only radio I have seen with a good turn around time is the Kenwood
      It is always good idea to look at the ARRL test specs.

      The data cable usually has one connection for 1200 Baud and 1 for 9600
      As well as the radio settings, the radio needs to have a very flat
      For FSK transmission, do not use the Mic plug as a FSK connection
      It will never work.

      Hope this is some help.


      Mike N9PMO
      BPQ32 Group Moderator
      -----Original Message-----
      From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:30 PM
      To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [BPQ32] Re: 9600 baud packet instability

      What rig or rigs are people using for 9600 packet?

      --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff - WA4ZKO" <wa4zko@...> wrote:
      > Alinco DR-235's are very marginal radios for 9.6k. The ARRL Lab BER
      testing for them reveals the problem.
      > You can probably pull your PACLEN back to 64 or 32 and see a small
      improvement in terms of retries at a cost of reduced throughput. You
      might do a bit better with a TNC that uses a true G3RUH modem, but I
      suspect you are fighting an uphill battle with a marginal radio for 9.6k
      (regardless of how it's advertised).
      > The DR-235 (and DR-435) rigs are good for 1200 baud, but horrid for
      9600 baud. If this is a backbone link (no users) you will do far better
      just running 1200 baud and opening up the parms (paclen, maxframe, ect).
      > As others have said deviation is important, but unless you are using
      older or modified radios with "wider" filters you will probably find the
      9.6k sweet spot on newer gear is around 2.8KHz peak deviation. Make sure
      your meter can show/measure peak deviation.
      > 73
      > Jeff
      > WA4ZKO
      > "Packet Radio never died, it just evolved."
      > http://twitter.com/wa4zko
      > --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "k1jtc" <jeffrey.t.clark@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Rather than reply to all I will post all replies here. I am running
      alinco 235. I have 2 radios sitting in the same room. From what I
      understand the KPC 9612 only supports 9600 baud on the com port so that
      is the highest speed to go to the computer. Am I wrong? S meter readings
      are full scale in the room as well as when I try across the city. The
      radios are identical except the one that is not hooked to the bbs has
      the internal tnc option.
      > >
      > > --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "N9ACQ" <n9acq@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Jeff
      > > >
      > > > The biggest problem with 9600 is deviation. Both ends should
      > > > be around 3 Khz. 9600 also need to bypass all audio amplifiers and
      > > > on both transmit and receive. A deviation meter really is needed
      to set the
      > > > proper audio level to the radio. The other thing is what is the S
      > > > reading on receive?
      > > >
      > > > 73 Bill
      > > >
      > > > N9ACQ
      > > >
      > >
    • Show all 23 messages in this topic