8033Re: [BPQ32] BPQ32 and 44.* addresses
- Mar 15, 2012On 3/15/2012 12:44 AM, Bill Vodall wrote:
>I agree with that, but I don't know why Linuxhams list members advised
> I'd suggest that the primary reason to use 44.* addresses would be if
> you wanted to do TCP on AX25 on the air AND connect it back to the
> world wide 44 systems with a tunnel. Other than that it's just like
> using one of the non-routed segments (192.168.*). It might even be
> adding confusion if you're using a 44 number that should be reachable
> from the Internet or other 44 net stations and it isn't available.
me to use 44.* instead of 192.168.* and if that change would remove
annoying ARP requests that Linux FPAC node sends to BPQ32 nodes in the
wired LAN. At the moment I do not plan doing any TCP on AX25 on the air,
etc. (It is just experimenting in the LAN.) Any idea?
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>