Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

6517Re: [BPQ32] Re: WHY

Expand Messages
  • ke7ugt@comcast.net
    Aug 3, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi Dale Thx for trying to get back to SB. Now on to me . Is it possible if I can find a program like Word with spelling Check to get it to work with the Chat mode. I know next I will want it to cook and clean but can it be done. let me know Rick


      From: "kj6ix_4" <kj6ix@...>
      To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 4:01:29 PM
      Subject: [BPQ32] Re: WHY

       



      To: KD8NCV

      Are you trying to set up BPQ32 ? Do you have it up and running but
      need a ax/ip link to link up ? More info is needed.

      Dale KJ6IX

      --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, S B <yochanan1975@...> wrote:
      >
      > I've never really gotten bpq32 to do anything, I use a Kantronics [white
      > box] tnc... I mainly just use outlook to read messages on eoc65 here in
      > michigan. Anyone have any ideas on BPQ32?
      >
      > 73's KD8NCV
      >
      > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:29 PM, <ke7ugt@...> wrote:
      >
      > > **
      > >
      > >
      > > Hi Dave Dale KJ6IX just got me set on bpq32 and I love it. Except I started
      > > getting these E-mail that I don't undersrand from a lot of people on the
      > > same subject like this one you sent me . Is there some reason or a place I
      > > can go to understand them. 73 KE7UGT Rick
      > >
      > > ------------------------------
      > > *From: *"Dave Webb" <druliefw@...>
      > > *To: *BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      > > *Sent: *Sunday, July 31, 2011 6:00:38 AM
      > > *Subject: *Re: [BPQ32] Re: Dupe bulletins with mangled BID
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > I noticed a couple of dupe bulletins where the BID's only difference is one
      > > message had an underscore between the call and message nr and the other
      > > message had a dash.
      > > Dave
      > > wb2hvf
      > >
      > >
      > > On 7/31/2011 2:42 AM, Charles Brabham wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > 
      > > KO, You seem to be under the impression that when a SYSOP uses FBB's
      > > alternate BID, it changes incoming BIDS to the new structure.
      > >
      > > Nope.
      > >
      > > My FFB-A system would produce its own BID for messages originating there -
      > > which would pass through FBB-B system with no BID change - normally in other
      > > words. FBB-A's BIDs and FFB'B's BID only get mixed up in the imagination of
      > > folks who have never utilized that feature.
      > >
      > > On the other hand...
      > >
      > > My FFB-B system would produce its own BID for messages originating there -
      > > which would pass through FBB-A system with no BID change - normally in other
      > > words. FBB-B's BIDs and FFB'A's BID only get mixed up in the imagination of
      > > folks who have never utilized that feature.
      > >
      > > Like F6FBB would put in a dupe creation feature.
      > >
      > > Duh.
      > >
      > > The alternate BID feature is there to allow a ham to operate two systems
      > > under the same callsign, with no BID conflict and, of course, no dupes.
      > >
      > > You could like, consult the FBB documentation. - That's what I did over a
      > > decade ago, when I first used this feature.
      > >
      > > You could also pay attention next time instead of arguing. - The arguing
      > > short-circuits the Elmer system, and wastes a lot of everybody's time.
      > >
      > >
      > > 73 DE Charles, N5PVL
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > ----- Original Message -----
      > > *From:* K.O. Higgs <n0kfq@...>
      > > *To:* BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      > > *Sent:* Saturday, July 30, 2011 9:11 PM
      > > *Subject:* Re: [BPQ32] Re: Dupe bulletins with mangled BID
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Because the original message using the original bid would be "in the wild"
      > > while the *same *message using the altered (or different) bid would also
      > > exist.
      > >
      > > K.O. n0kfq
      > >
      > > On 7/30/2011 8:28 PM, Charles Brabham wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > 
      > > It never caused any dupes for me, and I don't remember any reports of it
      > > causing dupes for anyone else - so the proper question might be:
      > >
      > > "Why would two differently structured BIDs that include the same callsign (
      > > or do not ) cause dupes?"
      > >
      > >
      > > 73 DE Charles, N5PVL
      > >
      > >
      > > ----- Original Message -----
      > > *From:* K.O. Higgs <n0kfq@...>
      > > *To:* BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      > > *Sent:* Saturday, July 30, 2011 7:32 PM
      > > *Subject:* Re: [BPQ32] Re: Dupe bulletins with mangled BID
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Yes, I know about that, but have never used it.
      > > Tell me, how can the use of *any *kind of "alternate bid" not cause dupes?
      > >
      > > K.O. n0kfq
      > >
      > > On 7/30/2011 7:04 PM, Charles Brabham wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > 
      > > FBB gives the option of an alternate BID so that you can run two BBS
      > > stations with the same callsign.
      > >
      > > I have used this feature a number of times, over the years. It works fine,
      > > no problems.
      > >
      > > 73 DE Charles, N5PVL
      > >
      > > ------------------------------
      > >
      > > ------------------------------
      > >
      > > No virus found in this message.
      > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      > > Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3799 - Release Date: 07/30/11
      > >
      > >
      > > --
      > >
      > > K.O. Higgs n0kfq@...
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >

    • Show all 53 messages in this topic