- May 9, 2013OK commented that out until we move to TNC-pi KPC-3 not happy with ACMODE so not using anything at present. Things getting faster!
--- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "John Wiseman" <john.wiseman@...> wrote:
> I suggest you don't use PITNC or NOPARAMS unless you are using a real
> TNC-PI. It could cause problems with other TNCs. The TNC-X is similar, but
> not the same.
> 73, John
> From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Sent: 09 May 2013 19:38
> To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [BPQ32] PITNC
> One more question; I'm beta testing my linbpq32 using a Raspberry pi plus
> TNC-X prior to moving to a RPi+TNC-pi setup. Hence I'm using;
> I think the -X to -PI are pretty similar apart from there linkage.
> But, the reason I have to ask this is due to the long delays I experience
> with linbpq32 both connecting and once connected getting to the next step
> (CMS or BBS stuff). I can directly compare this to my current system which
> is (RPi+TNC-pi) using the Ax25 stack and RMS per k4gbb. And it is slick!
> Connects are almost instantaneous and the next line almost as fast (CMS
> sometimes has a delay but that is CMS).
> What could be slowing my linbpq32 down so much?
- << Previous post in topic