Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

10541Re: PITNC

Expand Messages
  • w4jpa
    May 9, 2013
      OK commented that out until we move to TNC-pi KPC-3 not happy with ACMODE so not using anything at present. Things getting faster!

      --- In BPQ32@yahoogroups.com, "John Wiseman" <john.wiseman@...> wrote:
      > I suggest you don't use PITNC or NOPARAMS unless you are using a real
      > TNC-PI. It could cause problems with other TNCs. The TNC-X is similar, but
      > not the same.
      > 73, John
      > _____
      > From: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BPQ32@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
      > w4jpa
      > Sent: 09 May 2013 19:38
      > To: BPQ32@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [BPQ32] PITNC
      > One more question; I'm beta testing my linbpq32 using a Raspberry pi plus
      > TNC-X prior to moving to a RPi+TNC-pi setup. Hence I'm using;
      > I think the -X to -PI are pretty similar apart from there linkage.
      > But, the reason I have to ask this is due to the long delays I experience
      > with linbpq32 both connecting and once connected getting to the next step
      > (CMS or BBS stuff). I can directly compare this to my current system which
      > is (RPi+TNC-pi) using the Ax25 stack and RMS per k4gbb. And it is slick!
      > Connects are almost instantaneous and the next line almost as fast (CMS
      > sometimes has a delay but that is CMS).
      > What could be slowing my linbpq32 down so much?
      > 73
      > BobJ
      > W4JPA
    • Show all 3 messages in this topic