Re: [BCD396XT] paul, i admit defeat ...
- I have to agree but I have no where the same amount of experience as you. I
got the scanner into scanning Public Safety and could not get it out. I
tried everything even taking remote control of the scanner through FreeScan.
I was getting very frustrated. So I got online to the easy to read manual.
It showed me how to start various tasks but I quickly noticed that it
doesn't always show how to stop the task. Maybe it was there but I sure did
not see it. Of course I was under pressure because the scanner found a
channel and was motor-boating itself to death and would not move on. I did a
temp lockout but it kept finding another channel to make noise on. I don't
know for sure what I did but I find got it to stop scanning the Public
Don't get me wrong. I love the scanner. But it sure can be confusing and
frustrating at times. I agree with you that most of what I do is programming
through FreeScan. Doing anything on the keyboard scares me to death! LOL
I'll keep trying so I learn it someday!
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:57 PM
Subject: [BCD396XT] paul, i admit defeat ...
well, no. if i wanted to save the frequency i'd want a /save/ key so i could
have control over it. just enter the frequency i typed in and if i want to
save it somewhere i'll figure that out later. i have no idea where it wants
to save this frequency or whether having it saved will come back and bite me
in the ass later--that sort of thing happens constantly. so i'm lost. i can
either hit 'E(yes)' and let it take me into an uncharted menu tree from
which i can't get out of, or i can hit '.(no)' to cancel.
but i lie, hitting 'no' doesn't cancel anything. it takes me into a
different menu tree that i never asked for, don't want, and don't know how
to back out of. i have to resort to hitting the /.no/ key again to
(hopefully) get out of this menu without changing anything.
i hate to say it paul, but for me i just can't see how the 396xt user
interface could be any less intuitive. perhaps being a lifelong radioman and
computer technician has instilled me certain ideas about how such things
should interact with the user and i'm just incapable of learning a new
paradigm despite owning every single scrap of documentation available on how
to interact with this box. the best thing i can say about the user interface
is that i'm sure the radio shack scanners were worse.
Yahoo! Groups Links
- Very cool idea. Thinking outside the box is sometimes productive. Kind of like listening in on an older analog trunking system on a non trunk tracker scanner. Just throw in the frequencies and listen. And to find out you get, for the most part, better/farther reception. Cool.
From: chris451 <chris451@...>
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [BCD396XT] Fringe trunking (notrunk)
Just for fun I put in all the talk channels of a P25 system, then lock
out the control channel.
Programmed it as a conventional.
In the fringe (distant zone) I find I can pick up most traffic this way
due to the fact the trunk channel
will not decode in the fringe, but the P25 will. Perhaps that is
because there is error correction on the
speech coding and it decodes great, and there is minimal or no error
correction on the control channel.
Also when using a dicriminator tap and a conventional scanner with the
software decoding, now the
trunk radio performs as well as just "Notrunking" the talk channels, in
areas where the control channel is not locked in
(system ID will not display when holding on control channel)
How fun as it greatly multiplies the coverage (as long as you dont mind
getting everything rather than just interesting channels).
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]