Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [BCD396XT] Question for the 396/996 experts . . .

Expand Messages
  • Larry Koch
    Your idea of using separate GQK s for each city will serve you well. As Joe said, you will not be sacrificing any scan time. ... From: neilbell99
    Message 1 of 4 , May 27, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      Your idea of using separate GQK's for each city will serve you well. As Joe
      said, you will not be sacrificing any scan time.

      --------------------------------------------------
      From: "neilbell99" <neil.neilbell@...>
      Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 10:43 PM
      To: <BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com>
      Subject: [BCD396XT] Question for the 396/996 experts . . .

      > I want to monitor five cities in a metro area. Each city has 2 or 3
      > channels and all are conventional, not trunked channels. Which option
      > should I choose?
      >
      > 1. - Have all 12 channels in a single group under a single SQK, OR
      > 2. - Have a separate group for each city, each with a GQK under a single
      > SQK.
      >
      > The advantage of separate group GQKs allows me to turn off (or on) each
      > city but I don't want to sacrifice scan speed if it causes a significant
      > reduction in scanning speed.
      >
      > Suppose each city had a separate SQK? - would that impact scan speeds?
      >
      > Informed opinions welcomed!!
      >
      > Neil Bell, KJ6FBA
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.