Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [BCD396XT] 396xt

Expand Messages
  • johnstark
    Nope..... answered on another list.... John ... From: Mike To: Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:38 PM Subject:
    Message 1 of 7 , Oct 1, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Nope..... answered on another list....

      John

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Mike" <aar9sm@...>
      To: <BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:38 PM
      Subject: [BCD396XT] 396xt


      > Is it possible to make the ATT feature adjustable through the software in
      > this rig? To me 20 db is just to much for me 10 would be much better
      > setting for me and my location.
      >
      >
      >
      > 73
      >
      > Mike
      >
      > Arizona
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
    • Mike Curtis (KC)
      Just saw it happen on my 996 right now running firmware v3 ... On the Illinois Starcom21 P25 system, a patch showing in Pro96Com as 9019- 9055 with audio only
      Message 2 of 7 , Oct 2, 2008
      • 0 Attachment
        Just saw it happen on my 996 right now running firmware v3 ...



        On the Illinois Starcom21 P25 system, a patch showing in Pro96Com as
        9019->9055 with audio only coming out on 9055.



        From: BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com] On
        Behalf Of Dan Danz
        Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:58 PM
        To: BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: RE: [BCD396XT] "Handling" Talkgroup Patches



        Well, I'm pretty sure I was wrong about how this works with the latest
        firmware
        versions (for 996 at least.still waiting to confirm with XT). It *used
        to* be
        that way, but Paul says he thinks it was fixed, and I'm inclined to
        agree.

        At least for multi-select, I heard a hot call being broadcast with the
        voice of
        the INFO operator, but I *did not* have INFO selected, and I heard the
        hot call
        on one of the main talk groups, which I *did* have selected. That's
        exactly
        the behavior I want.

        Note that I'm talking about multi-select broadcasts. I'm not 100%
        certain how
        it works on patched channels. It's not something we do with regularity
        on the
        Maricopa P16. Phoenix does it a lot on their P25 -- I'll have to pay
        attention
        when I'm in range tomorrow.

        What, specifically, do you see/hear Mike?

        ________________

        Dan Danz (WA5SKM)

        Fountain Hills AZ

        From: Dan Danz [mailto:Dan.Danz@... <mailto:Dan.Danz%40att.net> ]
        Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 7:52 AM
        To: BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com>
        Subject: RE: [BCD396XT] "Handling" Talkgroup Patches

        I would add a strong "second" to this recommendation.

        I have to listen to lots of unwanted 10-27/10-28/10-29 queries on the
        INFO
        channel just in case it gets chosen for sending HOT traffic .. which it
        frequently does, because at MCSO in Phoenix, it's the INFO operator who
        multi-selects all the other channels and broadcasts the alert for the
        hot call
        ..

        ________________

        Dan Danz (WA5SKM)

        Fountain Hills AZ

        From: BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com>
        [mailto:BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com> ]
        On Behalf Of
        Mike Curtis (KC)
        Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 07:16
        To: BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com>
        Subject: [BCD396XT] "Handling" Talkgroup Patches

        One thing I think I would like more than anything else in a trunk
        tracking scanner is the ability to properly handle talkgroup patches on
        Motorola trunked systems. What I mean is, when TG A and TG B are
        patched together, I want to be able to hear the traffic regardless of
        whether I'm sitting on TG A or TG B. Currently the talkgroup that "gets
        the traffic" is dependent upon the order in which the dispatcher patches
        them. Any chance of ever getting this feature in a trunktracker? :)







        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.