302RE: [BCD396XT] I hit the brakes on the pro-106
- Dec 31, 2008John,
Mine has been tested when rig was new and again after it was sent in for
repair, which alignment was supposedly checked. Checked with each firmware ,
new antennas and coax still has not performed near as well as my 296 on UHF
using stock outside stock duck and a telescoping antenna, I could set it
anywhere and it picked it up without any problem, where as the 396 does not
even no it is there. But again this is my personal results and others
mileage may vary.
73 to all,
Have a safe and Happy New Year?
From: BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com [mailto:BCD396XT@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [BCD396XT] I hit the brakes on the pro-106
There are a number of things that can make the 396 appear to deaf, and in
most cases the fix is fairly simple. The firmware can cause it, but a simple
re-downloading and installong of the same firware once or twice usually
fixes that, the exact same thing with the programming, some times you have
to re-install it a couple times. Those two issues are easy to fix. The next
thing is obviously the antenna, they do wear out, with rubber ducks it's
usually a broken wire internally. I use the Radio Shack 800Mhz rubber duck
and bought one that was bad, replaced it and it hasn't come off that radio.
And lastly, it's very possible your particular radio may need adjusted and
sending it off to Uniden for a tweaking isn't unheard of.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dewey" <Dewey3@gmail. <mailto:Dewey3%40gmail.com> com>
To: <BCD396XT@yahoogroup <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com> s.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:01 AM
Subject: RE: [BCD396XT] I hit the brakes on the pro-106
>I sure hope this is not entirely true! The current 396 is DEAF on the UHF
> frequencies. The only thing that I have worse is the "C" model Pro-92.
> 396 in still my "primary" radio of choice, but I can NOT use it to monitor
> DC PD (603d UHF) from my home in DC's suburbs. My 235, 245, and 250 will
> run circles around the 396 when it comes to receiving UHF (mid to upper
> 400's). I can use the 235 and 245 to monitor DC PD's control channels
> pretty much full quieting, and I still monitor DC PD on the 250 while the
> 396 just sits there and says "Finding Control Channel". Sure the 235, 245
> and 250 have "larger" ground planes, but the amount is negligible! I'm
> seriously hoping that Uniden fixes whatever they broke when designing the
> current 396's front end.
> Not bashing, just an honest observation from someone who has been scanning
> DC since the early 70's with the old Realistic 4-channel portable.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BCD396XT@yahoogroup <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com> s.com
[mailto:BCD396XT@yahoogroup <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com> s.com] On
> Of MCH
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 08:18
> To: BCD396XT@yahoogroup <mailto:BCD396XT%40yahoogroups.com> s.com
> Subject: Re: [BCD396XT] I hit the brakes on the pro-106
> BTW, I don't think you're going to see much change in the audio or
> reception. Both are limited by the size of the unit - the audio since the
> speaker has to be small, and the reception since there isn't much of a
> ground plane for the antenna.
> Joe M.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>