Stone vs Goliath...Baty failed again
- Robert Baty has lost every debate by default. After his opponent posts their counter to Robert's Goliath Robert fails to take step #3 and post his "evidence" which has no opposing interpretation.
This is because Robert's Goliath is logically invalid.
1. Evidence doesn't speak. It must be interpreted by man.
2. All evidence has opposing interpretations
3. Robert "choosing an interpretation does not validate that interpretation as the only interpretation
4. Robert has been, is and always will be scientifically illiterate and unable to honestly discuss interpretations
5. Robert attempts to avoid getting to discussions of the evidence
6. Robert's so called "debates" have never reached the point of discussing this "evidence" spoken of in his "Goliath"
7. Mark Goldsmith has won by default