Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Peninsula cities seek consortium to negotiate HSR design details

Expand Messages
  • 2/21 SJ Mercury
    Published Saturday, February 21, 2009, by the San Jose Mercury News Peninsula cities may unite in bid to shape high-speed rail plans By Will Oremus Daily News
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 21, 2009
      Published Saturday, February 21, 2009, by the San Jose Mercury News

      Peninsula cities may unite in bid to shape high-speed rail plans

      By Will Oremus
      Daily News Staff Writer

      Seeking strength in numbers, officials from several Peninsula cities
      are looking to form a consortium to negotiate with state authorities
      on the design of the planned Los Angeles-to-San Francisco high-speed
      rail line.

      Mayors and council members from Palo Alto, Mountain View, Menlo Park,
      Atherton, Burlingame and other cities in the rail line's path have
      been meeting informally for weeks. Now they're moving toward an
      official agreement that would allow them to speak for their cities
      collectively in discussions with the California High Speed Rail

      Backers envision a group with enough credibility and clout to make
      sure the rail line isn't built in a way that blights the surrounding
      neighborhoods. For instance, it might push for the trains to run
      underground in certain areas, or, failing that, for the above-ground
      tracks to be designed with a low profile. As an example of the format,
      Palo Alto Council Member Yoriko Kishimoto cites the Bay Area Water
      Supply and Conservation Agency, or BAWSCA, which represents 25 cities
      and water districts that buy water from the San Francisco Public
      Utilities Commission.

      Not everyone is on board, however. In a Feb. 9 study session, Redwood
      City officials indicated they would rather work through existing
      regional bodies such as the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board,
      which operates Caltrain. While the ad hoc consortium was meeting
      Friday, Caltrain was in the process of crafting its own agreement
      with the high speed rail authority, which is expected to share its

      "I guess my question is, what are these other cities looking to do
      separate and apart from what already exists," said Redwood City Mayor
      Rosanne Foust. "I think we really need to be very careful and very
      conscious that we have a unified voice going forward. I would hate
      to see another body out there which could potentially hurt our joint
      powers board."

      That's not the intent, said Palo Alto Council Member Pat Burt, who
      supports the consortium idea. He noted that Peninsula representatives
      are a minority on the Caltrain board, which also serves San Francisco
      and San Jose.

      "We recognize we're part of Caltrain and we intend to collaborate
      closely with Caltrain," he said. "But the interests of Caltrain are
      not necessarily going to be the same as the interests of the Peninsula
      cities. We hope we can align the interest, but that's not a given."

      He added, "If the Peninsula cities want to have a strong voice,
      they're going to have to unify and speak as a group."

      There are already some differences of opinion between neighboring
      cities. While some, including Redwood City, have endorsed the high-
      speed rail plans, Menlo Park and Atherton have joined a lawsuit
      challenging the decision to run the trains up the Peninsula rather
      than through the East Bay.

      But Richard Cline, vice mayor of Menlo Park, said not everyone has
      to agree on every point in order for the consortium to be helpful.
      "Clusters of cities within the group will have certain concerns, and
      others will have different ones. We all still need to work together
      to get the attention and the appropriate emphasis on our needs."

      For instance, Cline said, almost every Peninsula city has poured
      money into efforts to make their downtowns and neighborhoods easy for
      pedestrians and bicyclists to navigate. By working together, they
      could help make sure that the new rail line doesn't undermine those
      plans by closing off cross streets.

      Stephen [BATN: Dan] Leavitt, deputy director of the rail authority,
      said his organization would welcome a chance to work with a group of
      cities at once rather than negotiating with all of them individually.
      "We'll be working with cities and communities throughout this entire
      process. When they're able to come together like this, it makes that
      a lot easier."

      In order to make the consortium official, the city councils of the
      member cities will have to sign off on a memorandum of understanding.
      At a meeting Friday, organizers drafted a letter that they'll ask
      their respective city councils to endorse in the next few weeks. If
      that happens, they'll send the letter on to the high-speed rail
      authority and ask for formal recognition.

      E-mail Will Oremus at woremus@...

      [BATN: See also:

      HSRA sued by cities, groups supporting Altamont Pass route

      HSRA to consider costly tunneling HSR through Peninsula cities

      Burlingame council questions SF HSR station, favors tunneling

      HSR officials extend SF-SJ comment period 1 month until April 6

      Menlo Park starts HSR negotiation campaign, to continue lawsuit

      Questions abound over HSR specifics for Caltrain, Peninsula cities

      Redwood City, Palo Alto to vie for mid-Peninsula HSR station
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BATN/message/39005 ]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.