Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Menlo Park, Atherton vote to oppose Prop. 1A HSR bond

Expand Messages
  • 9/25 Palo Alto Daily
    Published Thursday Sep 25, 2008, by the Palo Alto Daily News Not aboard! Menlo Park, Atherton want to derail plans for high-speed trains By Will Oremus Daily
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 25, 2008
      Published Thursday Sep 25, 2008, by the Palo Alto Daily News

      Not aboard!
      Menlo Park, Atherton want to derail plans for high-speed trains

      By Will Oremus
      Daily News Staff Writer

      In separate resolutions this week, the cities of Menlo Park and
      Atherton declared their opposition to Proposition 1A, a November
      state ballot measure that would build a high-speed rail line from
      Los Angeles to San Francisco and beyond.

      The two cities are the only ones in the proposed railroad's path
      to take a stand against it, state high-speed rail officials said.
      Regional agencies such as Caltrain and SamTrans have endorsed it,
      and Millbrae and Palo Alto have expressed interest in having the
      train stop in their cities.

      The Menlo Park City Council on Tuesday voted 3-1 to oppose
      Proposition 1A, which would raise $10 million to start construction
      on the 220 mph line. The Atherton City Council followed suit
      Wednesday with a 4-0 vote on a similar resolution.

      Both city councils said they believe the railroad, which would
      require an expansion of the Caltrain tracks, will blight and divide
      their communities. But their objections ranged beyond the local
      impacts. Both cited a deeper concern about the project's financing,
      arguing it will end up costing far more than projected and drawing
      far fewer riders.

      "In this troubling economic time, we need to see more information
      about exactly how the funding mechanism's going to work," said Menlo
      Park City Council Member Richard Cline. "We have virtually nothing
      on that."

      Atherton City Council Member Jim Dobbie said, "I suspect that high-
      speed rail, as presently planned, has a very high probability of
      being a financial disaster, which the state of California taxpayers
      will have to pay for."

      The cities are doing all they can to stop the train. The formal
      resolutions come after both councils voted in closed session to join
      a lawsuit against the project's environmental documents. The lawsuit
      is spearheaded by groups that had favored an alignment sending trains
      through the East Bay rather than up the Peninsula.

      The lawsuit will take time, however. Meanwhile, the cities have
      turned their attention from the railroad's geographic alignment to
      what they see as fundamental flaws in the high-speed rail concept.

      At a study session before Wednesday's vote on the resolution, the
      Atherton council heard pro-con arguments from high-speed rail
      architect Rod Diridon and local opponent Jack Ringham.

      As he did in a similar study session earlier this month in Menlo
      Park, Diridon laid out the rail line's benefits. In zipping
      passengers from Los Angeles to San Francisco in less than two-and-a-
      half hours, he said, it would ease freeway and air congestion, cut
      pollution and keep California competitive in the global market.

      It would do all of that, he said, for about $40 billion, with the
      state's investment complemented by federal funds and private

      Ringham took aim at the projections underpinning those claims. He
      said there's no way the train will attract 117 million passengers per
      year by 2030. And he called the $55 estimated ticket cost misleading,
      noting that the figure is in 2005 dollars.

      Atherton's council members, and many residents, appeared swayed by
      Ringham's comparisons of the project to Boston's "Big Dig" and other
      infrastructure projects that have run way over budget. Several also
      said the state should first address other priorities, such as
      regional transit.

      "I just fail to see a hint of reality" in the California High Speed
      Rail Authority's business plan, said Atherton Vice Mayor Jerry

      Menlo Park resident Judy Font summarized the objections of many
      homeowners in saying, "Many of us feel this project is going to
      cause great damage and no benefit to our town."

      Atherton resident William Morgan was one of a few who disagreed. He
      said high-speed rail would solve a lot of the problems that plague

      "It's loud, it wakes people up at night, it's smelly, it kills
      people, and you have to wait at street crossings for the trains to go
      by," Morgan said. He said the state project represents a "phenomenal
      opportunity" because it would include funds to electrify Caltrain and
      separate it from cross streets, eliminating dangerous crossings.

      Atherton council members Charles Marsala and Kathy McKeithen said
      their biggest problem with the project was the lack of information on
      exactly how it would affect their town and others on the Peninsula.
      The rail authority has completed an environmental report for the
      project as a whole, but it won't study the engineering details and
      effects on local communities until the bond passes.

      Among the unknowns are exactly how many tracks will be needed,
      whether they'll be elevated on bridges over cross streets or
      submerged in a trench, and how much local property, if any, might
      be lost in the Caltrain line's expansion.

      Diridon said such details will be worked out in cooperation with
      the cities. He pleaded with Atherton officials and residents to
      stop "digging your heels in" and instead focus on how to best make
      the project work for their city.

      "Work with us," he said. "We want to work with you."

      Though he disagreed with Diridon on just about everything else,
      Ringham agreed that the city probably can't stop the rail bond and
      will need to figure out how best to cope with it.

      The Atherton council on Wednesday considered a resolution calling for
      the train to pass through the city in a trench, but tabled the idea
      to avoid watering down its stance against the project as a whole.

      ON THE WEB

      For more information about the California high-speed rail project,
      visit the California High Speed Rail Authority:


      E-mail Will Oremus at woremus@...

      [BATN: See also:

      Menlo Park council member: why I'm against Prop. 1A HSR bond

      Comment: Come hear HSR get NIMBY-whipped at Atherton meeting

      Atherton council to hold HSR study session on Sept. 24

      Editorial: Can NIMBY Menlo Park, Atherton stop HSR juggernaut?

      Menlo Park, Atherton join lawsuit to invalidate HSR EIR

      Menlo Park, Atherton join suit against Pacheco-biased HSR EIR

      Menlo Park, Atherton join suit challenging HSR EIR

      Atherton, Menlo Park councils blast high-speed rail plans

      Atherton worried by Caltrain, high-speed rail plans

      Atherton stunned high speed rail may take property (7 May 04)

      Atherton meeting to focus on Caltrain, high-speed rail (28 Apr 04)

      Letter: Atherton wrong to oppose high-speed rail (5 Nov 03)

      Atherton to create panel to fight high-speed trains (22 Oct 03)

      Atherton officials vow to fight high-speed rail (5 May 03)
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BATN/message/11840 ]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.