Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

BART SFO extension's unfinished financial business

Expand Messages
  • 6/17 Redwood City Independent
    Published Tuesday, June 17, 2003, in the Redwood City Independent The extension s unfinished business BART s start not the end to all problems By Sara Zaske
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 8 8:24 AM
      Published Tuesday, June 17, 2003, in the Redwood City Independent

      The extension's unfinished business
      BART's start not the end to all problems

      By Sara Zaske
      Independent Newspapers

      Millbrae BART trains may start rolling into four new Peninsula
      stations in June, but that does not mean the work on the 8.7-mile
      Peninsula extension is complete.

      Long after the concrete has set, some hard work will still be
      pouring into several unresolved issues on the project. BART and its
      construction contractor, Tutor-Saliba, have not yet worked out who
      will pay for the last round of delays on the $1.5 billion project.
      And the final agreement between SamTrans and BART over the financing
      of line's operation has yet to be inked.

      Nov. 7, 2002 was set for Tutor-Saliba to deliver "the keys" to BART,
      allowing the transit agency to begin a 10-week period of safety
      tests. With each day beyond the designated handing-over date, Tutor-
      Saliba accumulated "liquidated damages," according to BART
      spokesperson Mike Healy. In other words, under the contract, BART
      could charge Tutor-Saliba $64,000 for every day they were late. The
      final turnover of the project to the transit agency occurred in mid-

      The penalties racked up by Tutor-Saliba could amount to $9.7
      million, but both BART and Tutor-Saliba downplay the seriousness of
      the issue. "We will still be negotiating a settlement with the
      contractor," Healy said. "On large contracts like this, there is
      nothing unusual about this."

      Ron Tutor, president of, Tutor-Saliba, said BART has not levied any
      charges against his company to date. In fact, he postulated that the
      transit agency might actually owe his business for the work.

      "One side owes the other," he said. "There were literally dozens of
      changes during the period in question. We will go through a
      scheduled analysis to see if they are liquidated damages, but it may
      turn out quite the contrary -- that they owe us for the time."

      Tutor-Saliba's accounting practices have already come into serious
      question on two urban transit projects. In August 2001, a Los
      Angeles Superior Court judge ordered the company to pay $30 million
      to the Southern California's Metropolitan Transportation Authority
      for work done on the city's subway system. The MTA claimed that
      Tutor-Saliba falsified charges on change orders and used minority
      fronts to win contracts.

      While the company appeals the ruling, San Francisco-has cited
      similar charges in a pending suit against the company for the San
      Francisco Airport International Terminal project.

      However, Healy said that BART had a positive working relationship
      with the Tutor-Saliba. In addition to the Peninsula extension, Tutor-
      Saliba also worked on the Pittsburg/Baypoint extension, a project
      which arrived on schedule. "Relatively speaking, our experience with
      Tutor-Saliba has been pretty good," said Healy.

      Likewise, Tutor expressed confidence that the two agencies could
      agree on the issues regarding the delay.

      Another apparently amiable disagreement is occurring between
      SamTrans and BART. Considered partners on the extension project, the
      two agencies are still hashing out details on the operations of the
      line. Under the original agreement, BART employees will be staffing
      the stations and running the trains, but SamTrans will be picking up
      the tab. To pay for the operations costs, SamTrans will receive all
      fare revenues for trips originating or ending in San Mateo County
      and half of the parking fees.

      This money is supposed to match the cost of operations, but with the
      economy patting a damper on the number of transit riders, the
      Peninsula agency will likely have to subsidize the extension line
      service for several years, if the original arrangement holds.

      Neither BART nor SamTrans would reveal what issues remain on the
      table, but SamTrans spokesperson Janet McGovern said that the ongoing
      negotiations will not impede the June 22 launch of the transportation

      Contact Sara Zaske at 650-652-6736 or szaske@...
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.