Fw: [Ayreton] Re: Question from Town Meeting
- I need to make a clarification, since apparently I did not parse this posting well enough for some.The text under 'Why:' is MY editorial about the posting. At no time did Mistress Gianetta as Towne Cryer make any comments in that post, or to my knowledge at any other time, with reference to the 'pay-to-play' aspects of having a non-event based PIB meeting. Mistress Gianetta informed me that she felt that the posting as presented misrepresented her intent or views, and that was not my intent at all. It was simply contributed in response to Ian's request for documentation.-- Grimkirk----- Forwarded Message ----
From: John Adams <auldefarte@...>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 10:12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Ayreton] Re: Question from Town MeetingWhere: [Ayreton]Who: Ayreton Towne CryerWhen: 2/17/08 1:05pmWhy: Because Baronial business was ostensibly not supposed to be on the docket at Stone Dog Inn (SDI). The docket at that event was was changed at the last minute, for reasons attributed to the Kingdom Transition Officer. But the expectation for a non-event based meeting was established prior to SDI.-- Grimkirk
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.