Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

948Re: [Ayreton] Re: Background checks for Youth people

Expand Messages
  • JC Ravage
    Apr 18, 2007
      I would add (6) What leeway do we have?  I.E, is this a mandated part of some legal settlement, which we can't change except on the edges, or is this a prophylactic measure against future liability?

      On 4/18/07, Dayle Harding <acelinaofderelei@...> wrote:

      Here are some of the issues that I will be writing a letter about, based in a large part to the response I've been getting on the Youth Combat egroup.

      1) What is the scope of these checks, and what constitutes a "fail"? Especially as all the SCA is supposed to be getting is either a pass or fail.

      2) What is the recourse for an individual to "clear his/her name" in the case of a false fail?

      3) Funding....it is a good question.  Will membership dues have to be raised?  How else will the kingdoms afford this?  I do understand that the kingdoms with larger programs should bear more cost than their smaller counterparts, but....

      4) Isn't this why we instituted the two non-related adult rule?

      5) It will indeed, as our esteemed Mayor stated, have the possible unintended effect of shutting down smaller groups ability to have children's activities.  Or, to begin the process of shutting down children's activities at all at events.  Which will drive membership away.

      Ok, that's all that comes to mind off the top of my head.  I do have notes and a draft started. 

      And yes, letters are important now.  The BoD has asked for feedback to help in their deliberations.  Let's give that feedback, regardless of your feelings (meaning either pro or con).  The best decisions tend to come when opposing thoughts are given, and all issues weighed.


      ----- Original Message ----
      From: David Roland <mystborne@...>
      To: Ayreton@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:51:41 AM
      Subject: [Ayreton] Re: Background checks for Youth people

      As a former child care worker of seven years at a shelter for abused
      and neglected children I was surprised that people whose primary
      responsibility was for working with children were not required to have
      some kind of back ground check. I have many horror stories of what
      happens to children by adults.

      However the SCA is NOT a child care company. And the costs for
      checking anyone who has any contact with children are prohibitive for
      our Not For Profit company. And so there must be a balance in my mind
      between the two.

      My letter also shall be going to the appropriate individuals.


      Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
      Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.

      "Hard it is to lift a full cup without spilling."--Gorice XII
    • Show all 12 messages in this topic