1962Shell without Ravenslake (was...)
- Feb 1, 2008
> This issue was in fact brought up and discussed during the initialMy recollection of those early meetings, before the straw polls
> meetings before the poll. The general response was that such a
> possibility was terribly unlikely, and that we would deal with it
> later if that slight possibility became a reality.
> Well, here we are, unlikely as it seemed at the time. Are we going
> to in fact deal with it, or try to sweep it under the rug?
began, includes a general response that the possibility of one or
more groups opting out was a real possibility, but that it would not
necessarily mean that the remaining groups couldn't or oughtn't
proceed. In fact, the one thing that I recall being seen as a "deal-
breaker" would be if TGS wasn't in, because TGS shares borders will
all of the local Shires, and so can form a contiguous land-mass with
any subset thereof, whereas the "donut barony" wasn't as appealing...
(It's very possible that I was at different meetings than you were,
though-- I was mostly attending meetings at Grey Gargoyles, at that
At the TGS business meeting, where the "straw poll" happened, I
recall an unconfirmed report being given, that "Ravenslake is likely
to pursue a Barony on their own," shortly BEFORE the straw poll took
place-- so, if I remember that one meeting correctly, then the TGS
membership voted to proceed, in full knowledge of Ravenslake not
being party to the shell.
So, from my perspective, there's nothing to "sweep under the rug"--
it's just a thing that doesn't seem particularly relevant, to me.
Knowing now that it's relevant to YOU, however, makes it more
relevant to me, too-- since I'm primarily concerned that everyone has
an opportunity to feel that their concerns have been heard, and are
satisfied that those concerns are addressed.
> There was a strong opinion that one of the major advantages of theI don't think that I agree. Being five instead of six is, I think,
> shell barony format was to form, as the letter of intent indicates,
> a coherent structure for regional unity. Well, that will no longer
> be the case.
no impediment to unity among those five.
> The new proposed structure will institutionalize the connectionsOn the contrary, Ravenslake has chosen not to join the other groups;
> between some of those groups and exclude other groups.
they'll by no means be excluded, but have chosen not to share those
formal connections. I'm not sure I understand why you think that
five groups cannot unite, without the sixth, nor why you see
exclusion in any of this-- can you elaborate, or enlighten me to your
>For my part, I certainly don't deny that a Barony with Ravenslake as
> ...You cannot deny that it changes the relationships between groups
> when such structural boundaries are put in place.
a member will be considerably different than a Barony with Ravenslake
as a neighbor. I think that either situation is viable.
> When it comes to such things as baronial events, baronial awards,And it's right and fitting that each group (and each individual, by
> baronial championships, baronial mailing lists, etc., all of which
> were proposed as advantages of the shell barony, some groups and
> individuals in the region will be able to participate and some will
way of his or her voice within that group) has the choice to
participate, or not. Ravenslake has *chosen* not to be part of the
shell Barony. By all accounts I've heard, they've so chosen, in
order to pursue their own Baronial advancement-- but whether that
rumor is true or not is beside the point: they got to choose, and
that's the important thing.
> I think these changes to the initial scope of the proposed regionalSorry if you've felt like your concerns were brushed aside-- as I
> structure need to be taken seriously, not just brushed aside.
said above, I personally hadn't addressed them, because I didn't
realize that you had such a different perspective on what "we" knew
going into this process than you did, so I was much less surprised by
Ravenslake's choice than you were...
By all means, now that everyone knows that Ravenslake isn't part of
the advancement proposal, let's talk about HOW that changes what we
might become, so that everyone can follow their own conscience in
terms of what's being done, and why, and how.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>