1923Re: [Ayreton] Re:Letter of Intent
- Jan 30, 2008Good my Lord, you do cut to the chase, don't you. I
give you my thanks for it.
Everything you say is indeed most true. A re-poll (we
don't vote) would be fraught with the same pitfalls.
And is quite unnecessary, as there would seem to be
sufficient evidence of dissent within the numbers
already collected. The point I make is that given
significant dissent (or, in the case of those who
choase to abstain, a failure to be convinced of the
issue's merits), there is reason for concern that
making this move might not be wholly in the best
interest of the community in this locality.
A community is comprised of more than simply the
numbers of its constituents. There is the kinship
which one feels for their neighbor. There is the sense
of belonging, that you co-exist with others of like
mind and spirit. When any segment of that community
cares so little for those factors, especially enough
to draw a line down the middle of Main Street and say,
'We outnumber you and therefore do not care what you
think', the 'community' is genuinely emperiled.
The 'remedy' you seek from me is not easily manifest.
It would require that those who supposedly seek to
'facilitate (formal) representation of this area' to
actually care about the potential for negative impact
upon this group, and not just the prize at the end of
--- JC Ravage <ravagio@...> wrote:
> What remedy do you suggest? Any re-vote will have____________________________________________________________________________________
> the same problems as the last one, with regard to
> people not voting. The voting was well-announced
> and proxies were available, so the only reason
> someone could not have made their vote recorded
> would be if they weren't paying attention at all
> until it was too late. Any re-vote that had a
> fixed deadline could not do better. What assurance
> do we have that enough people to satisfy you would
> turn up at the Towne Hall you suggested in your
> first post, when they didn't vote or send proxies
> to the voting that already took place?
> If instead you're asking for the polls to remain
> open until everyone's said "yea" or "nay," that's
> effectively asking for us to never do anything
> about it.
> William Atherbridge
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>