1919Re:Letter of Intent
- Jan 30, 2008Hello all,
(speaking as an individual, NOT senechal)
I wish to address Grimkirk's concerns (with the
realization I may end up getting attacked). I
understand peoples apprehensions of becoming a barony.
This discussion has been open since last spring and
the opinions have been listened to time & time again.
In terms of being not clearly in favor, when has there
ever been that in any voting? How many people choose
to abstain from our own governmental voting?
(especially when it's your own local town hall
meetings that will affect the zonings, businesses, and
residencies in your own town?) This situation is no
different. I'm not saying that the opinions of those
that abstained from voting have no opinion or that
their opinion was not listened to, but at the point of
putting the issue to a vote, they made the choice to
NOT vote. It does not mean they agree, IT DOES NOT
MEAN THEY DISAGREE EITHER, so do not take their
silence as being against the issue. You have your own
opinions, others have theirs, and they shall remain
As for a request to have a non-event related town hall
meeting, I (personally: not speaking for others)am
willing to entertain the notion. If any suggestions
can be made on a time, date & place where ALL AYRETON
IS ABLE TO ATTEND AND PAYMENT FOR SPACE IS NOT NEEDED
I will be there. With this people will need to
consider others work schedules, personal priorities
and activities as well as not conflicting with other
various activities that people will say have more
priority over this town hall meeting that has been
(as I return to being woodwork)
Isabella De Bolsa
2c. Re: Letter of Intent
Posted by: "auldefarte" auldefarte@...
Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:02 pm (PST)
Group: YES NO Abstain % Not clearly
Vanished Woods: 6 2 5 53.9%
Foxvale 8 0 3 27.3%
Grey Gargoyles 12 4 1 29.5%
Rokkehealden 14 4 3 33.4%
Tree Girt Sea 15(c) 3(+3) 1 28.6%
This vote was tied to the motion to drop
its Provincial status, so as to become an
equal canton with the other groups participating.
(c) = Corrected count
Per Nadezda, Ayreton list 7/19/07.
(+3)= Missed poll, but known to be opposed,
Ravenslake 0 19 0 100.0%
They will likely proceed with their own efforts
to become a barony.
------------ --------- --------- --------- -------
Average not clearly in favor: 34.54%
Therefore I wish to respectfully request the committee
Ayreton-wide town hall (ONLY) day function to be held
calendar days of your committee's receipt of the
Kingdom's permission to
proceed. This function should be specifically for the
purpose of holding
collective and open discussion of all points of view
on the subject
across all groups, particularly for the benefit of
those who may not
have had an opportunity to hear any opposing arguments
(pro or con), or
for unavailable commentors to provide adequate and
timely proxy for
their statements; not just a partial gathering of
parties convened at a conveniently located group event
likely require interested parties to pay to attend.
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>