1528Re: Groups Transition Discussion
- Sep 18, 2007Responded to Privately
--- In Ayreton@yahoogroups.com, "auldefarte" <auldefarte@...> wrote:
> Apologies to the list:
> Its really sad that I must respond to this, since I'm really
> tired of having to defend or explain myself (and my very presence)
> you. In short: I'm back. Please find a way to get over it.
> I've already had a private e-mail exchange with with Merrill about
> this, explaining that my comments on the Ayreton list were not
> as a personal attack in any way, and received a pleasant response.
> And had you read the actual posted comments, you'd see I also
> indicated that I perceived no malice on Merrill's part in any way.
> Perhaps you might check with her before looking for fault where
> is none.
> -- Grimkirk
> --- In Ayreton@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Scrip" <tomscrip@> wrote:
> > We all know that there are more people on the book's then show up
> > for a TGS meeting. Most of them play with other groups in the
> > Groups that have there own opinion about a Barony in this area
> > how it should be formed. IF they are putting in their two cents
> > the another group why do they have to put it in aging over here?
> > know it's the Chicago way to vote early and offen)
> > The suggestion that Nadezda is trying to hide a out come of a
> > vote, or a question brought forth to the group (or what ever you
> > want to call it) When a simpel subtraction would tell you the
> > answere (I may not know how to spell but I can count). Is a kin
> > questioning her honor. And besides me, I'm sure that there are a
> > few our Brothers that would also stand to defend it.
> > Aethelwulf of Dover
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>