1526Re: Groups Transition Discussion
- Sep 18, 2007Apologies to the list:
Its really sad that I must respond to this, since I'm really getting
tired of having to defend or explain myself (and my very presence) to
you. In short: I'm back. Please find a way to get over it.
I've already had a private e-mail exchange with with Merrill about
this, explaining that my comments on the Ayreton list were not meant
as a personal attack in any way, and received a pleasant response.
And had you read the actual posted comments, you'd see I also
indicated that I perceived no malice on Merrill's part in any way.
Perhaps you might check with her before looking for fault where there
--- In Ayreton@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Scrip" <tomscrip@...> wrote:
> We all know that there are more people on the book's then show up
> for a TGS meeting. Most of them play with other groups in the area,
> Groups that have there own opinion about a Barony in this area and
> how it should be formed. IF they are putting in their two cents in
> the another group why do they have to put it in aging over here? (I
> know it's the Chicago way to vote early and offen)
> The suggestion that Nadezda is trying to hide a out come of a poll,
> vote, or a question brought forth to the group (or what ever you
> want to call it) When a simpel subtraction would tell you the
> answere (I may not know how to spell but I can count). Is a kin to
> questioning her honor. And besides me, I'm sure that there are a
> few our Brothers that would also stand to defend it.
> Aethelwulf of Dover
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>