Re: [Autism-Mercury] re: why not EDTA?
- Great I will look that up, thank you so much
From: Bernard Windham <berniew1@...>
To: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
Date: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:27 PM
Subject: [Autism-Mercury] re: why not EDTA?
>why is it that now it seems or on this list it seems that DMPS and the
>other chelation products are now used instead of EDTA? Why does this
>form of Chelation seem to work better than the older type. Susan
> Scientific studies have shown that DMPS and DMSA are more
>effective chelators for mercury than EDTA, which isn't very effective
>for mercury. I have references somewhere. www.altcorp.com also
>does(Boyd Haley-U. of Kent.)
>Also same site has reference that EDTA forms extremely neurotoxic
>compounds with mercury and affects brain/memory/etc.
> EDTA is good to chelate excess calcium, but should not be used
>until mercury level is lowered using something else in Dr. Haley's
>Community email addresses:
> Post message: Autism-Mercury@onelist.com
> Subscribe: Autism-Mercuryfirstname.lastname@example.org
> Unsubscribe: Autism-Mercuryemail@example.com
> List owner: Autism-Mercuryfirstname.lastname@example.org
>Shortcut URL to this page: