Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [Autism-Mercury] re: why not EDTA?

Expand Messages
  • Susan Rodriguez
    Great I will look that up, thank you so much Susan ... From: Bernard Windham To: autism-mercury@egroups.com
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 1, 2000
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Great I will look that up, thank you so much
      Susan
      -----Original Message-----
      From: Bernard Windham <berniew1@...>
      To: autism-mercury@egroups.com <autism-mercury@egroups.com>
      Date: Thursday, August 31, 2000 8:27 PM
      Subject: [Autism-Mercury] re: why not EDTA?


      >
      >why is it that now it seems or on this list it seems that DMPS and the
      >other chelation products are now used instead of EDTA? Why does this
      >form of Chelation seem to work better than the older type. Susan
      >
      > Scientific studies have shown that DMPS and DMSA are more
      >effective chelators for mercury than EDTA, which isn't very effective
      >for mercury. I have references somewhere. www.altcorp.com also
      >does(Boyd Haley-U. of Kent.)
      >Also same site has reference that EDTA forms extremely neurotoxic
      >compounds with mercury and affects brain/memory/etc.
      > EDTA is good to chelate excess calcium, but should not be used
      >until mercury level is lowered using something else in Dr. Haley's
      >opinion.
      >Bernie
      >
      >
      >Community email addresses:
      > Post message: Autism-Mercury@onelist.com
      > Subscribe: Autism-Mercury-subscribe@onelist.com
      > Unsubscribe: Autism-Mercury-unsubscribe@onelist.com
      > List owner: Autism-Mercury-owner@onelist.com
      >
      >Shortcut URL to this page:
      > http://www.onelist.com/community/Autism-Mercury
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.