Re: [Authentic_SCA] Probably more than you needed to know about Brittany...
- It was full liege homage, according to several of my sources. Meaning he
acknowledged the King of France as his overlord in Brittany. It's not
like the Dukes of Brittany were fully independent of the French Crown
even before that, despite what later 'separatists' may say in basis of
that claim. This was just the step from peripheral client state to full
You don't have to be granted lands to be a vassal. You may also become a
vassal by subjugating your current lands to another, theoretically more
powerful, noble. This is what the Dukes of Brittany did...
I was incorrect about the year. It was 1297...
> What did the contract say? If he became a vassal to the king of by--
> given fiefs that were not in Brittany or were not all of Brittany,
> hdet hde
> status of Brittany was not affected. Your saying that the Duke
> Brittany and recieved it back as a fief. Is this what happened? The
> fief that was granted to the Duke in exchange for his service is all
> important here.
The countdown had stalled at T minus 69 seconds when Desiree, the first
female ape to go up in space, winked at me slyly and pouted her thick,
rubbery lips unmistakably -- the first of many such advances during what
would prove to be the longest, and most memorable, space voyage of my
- --- In Authentic_SCA@y..., Steven Proctor <sproctor@b...> wrote:
> It was full liege homage, according to several of my sources.When you say that the Duke's oath of fealty and homage to the King of
> Meaning he acknowledged the King of France as his overlord in
> Brittany. It's not like the Dukes of Brittany were fully
> independent of the French Crown even before that, despite what
> later 'separatists' may say in basis of that claim. This was just
> the step from peripheral client state to full vassalage.
France made Brittany "part of France," it seems to me that you're
combining two totally different political paradigms. When we think
of "France" we're thinking of a modern nation-state, something that
arguably didn't exist in 1300. Even when the idea of "France" as a
nation became clear, it didn't necessarily include all the lands
whose lords swore fealty to the King of France. Didn't someone just
point out that Joan of Arc talked of "going into France" when she
travelled north from her hometown?
The lines of fealty in the 13th century were tangled--for example,
King John was a vassal of the Pope, but no one claims that England
was "part of the Papal States." There's obviously more to nationhood
than independent fealty.