Re: Patching garments?
- --- In Authentic_SCA@yahoogroups.com, CLEY <cley56@...> wrote:
>Buddhist priests wear a patchwork mantle called a kesa (Japanese), jiasha (Chinese) or kasaya (Sanskrit). Originally pieced from dirty rags, they eventually became far more opulent as donors gifted temples with silks belonging to deceased relatives. At least one description I've read seems to indicate that the act of constructing a kesa from many small pieces was considered a devotional exercise.
> Isn't there a story that Francis wished his robe to be made of patches,
> as a token of humility?
> Or am I confused with someone else?
Ironically, when I started looking for images to post, I discovered that the Kyoto National Museum currently has an exhibition on kesa:
If you scroll down, the kesa shown at the bottom of the article is pieced from silk and gold brocade.
(Pieced garments also became fashionable in 16th century Japan. A number of surviving robes from that period are either pieced or decorated to look as if they are pieced from alternating blocks of fabric. There's also at least one example that bears an uncanny resemblance to a "crazy quilt.")
Saionji no Hana
My first response, upon reading
> Asfridhr's speculation was to say, "no, on the inside!" because that is the<<snip>>
> most common method I learned for darning/patching frayed fabric.
I found a mention of an item patched on the inside-- one of the hoods from Viking Age Dublin.
E. Wincott Heckett. 2003. "Viking Age Headcoverings from Dublin" (Dublin: Royal Irish Academy")
pp. 44, 46:
"In wool cap DHC32 (Pl. VII, Fig. 52) a large patch has been sewn to the inside of the right-hand part. The sides of the patch have been turned under and it has been slip-stitched to the inside of the cap. If the patch had been put on to over a hole, placing it like this on the inside would leave the rough edges of the tear exposed to view on the outside, which is contrary to usual sewing practice. Placing the patch as it is means that the smooth surface would have been against the wearer's ear. This may suggest that the patch was put on to provide extra protection and warmth, or to strengthen a threadbare rather than a torn area. It may also be that it was unimportant that ragged edges were left on the outside. This would be true if the cap was worn under another headcovering or indeed as a nightcap."
There are other patches in there, too, but I thought this particular one on the inside might be interesting as a possible exception to the rule. :)