Re: Elizabethan underwear/clothing in general
> >Ok :-( But thanks anyway! I've just kinda been letting itsit...maybe the
> >ropes will un-twist on their own and I won't have to worry aboutit?
> ><keeping fingers crossed>it in
> Hmm, have you tried hanging it over night or kind of trying to roll
> the casing? Either might help.I doubt that they will untwist by themselves if it is just sitting
around. You might want to try just holding it by the waistband and
jiggling it up and down for a while and see if the ropes look like
that will help.. Or put it on and then do an aerobic step workout.
- --- In Authentic_SCA@y..., Danielle Nunn-Weinberg <dannw@m...> wrote:
> >Umm - I knew you'd get me for this <G>.
> Yup. : )
> >I mean a skirt without an underskirt showing. That makes better
> >sense, I hope.
> LOL! Ah, I usually just refer to them as closed front skirts. I'm
> it's less confusing to people who don't know that foreparts are thehighly
> decorated (or out of rich fabric) roughly triangular shaped panelsattached
> (seem to be usually pinned or tied) to the front of a kirtle skirt(usually
> of a less valuable fabric) used to fill in the area of the openfronted
> skirts. : ) Or did I just confuse the issue further?Nope, my dear you were the soul of clarity.
How did you get on with the button?
I finally managed to get a baby silver pomander, supposed to be a
16th century replica. It's smaller than I thought it was, but very
sweet. Unfortunately the retailer has deleted the pics off the
auction before I got a chance to save them.