27255Re: [Authentic_SCA] Shoes
- Jan 2, 2003At 10:48 AM 1/2/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>And for their later stuff, that's fine, as I had said. But they areOh, sorry, I didn't read carefully enough. You are correct. *blush*
>showing 1300-1400 style uppers, with heeled soles, which is not correct.
>Agreed, sometime in the 1500's it became increasingly common, but for
>the earlier stuff they are showing there should not be a heel.
Despina de la should read more carefully
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>